August 25, 2007
ON THE OTHER HAND, WE DIDN'T SEND THEM TO GITMO!:
The Squall After the Whirlwind: A British historian takes Americans to task for their role in the post-World War II occupation : a review of AFTER THE REICH: The Brutal History of the Allied Occupation By Giles MacDonogh (Andrew Nagorski, August 26, 2007, NY Times Book Review)
There's a gruesome last chapter to World War II, the bloodiest war in history. During the forced expulsions of about 12 million Germans from the Reich's eastern provinces, mostly from territory that became part of the newly reconstituted states of Poland and Czechoslovakia, about 2 million died. Imprisonment in former Nazi concentration camps, death marches, starvation, beatings, rapes and outright murder were all commonplace. As the Red Army and many local inhabitants saw it, this was justifiable revenge for Germany's monstrous crimes. The Americans, Brits and French didn't engage in violence on anything close to that scale, but they, too, sometimes let their desire for revenge get the better of them.For a long time, this record of retribution was a taboo topic outside of Germany. Even the Germans worried that emphasizing their suffering could open them to accusations of rewriting history to cast themselves as equal victims. But since the collapse of communist regimes in their countries in 1989, at least some Poles and Czechs have been confronting that history. (Don't expect anything of the sort from Putin's Russia, where Stalin is glorified once again.) And in the West, this is a painful subject that has been attracting more attention.
In After the Reich, Giles MacDonogh, a British author of several books about German history, chronicles the final weeks of the war and the occupation that followed. His ambitious mission: to offer a comprehensive, unsparing account of what happened to the German people when the tables were turned. MacDonogh works to assemble a massive indictment of the victors, and his array of detail and individual stories is both impressive and exhausting. But he's far less successful in navigating the tricky moral terrain that such a subject inevitably occupies. As a result, his is a deeply flawed book.
The Germans may have had it coming, but the real moral crime was leaving Poland, Czechoslovakia, etc. to the ministrations of the Soviets. Posted by Orrin Judd at August 25, 2007 8:46 AM
The Germans had called a Vernichtungskreig, a war of annihilation. They have no right to complain that their opponents took them seriously.
Out of mercy and forbearance, we spared them their own vision of final victory.
Posted by: Lou Gots at August 25, 2007 9:13 AMYes, and we're still paying for that today.
Posted by: erp at August 25, 2007 12:58 PMYes, we're still paying for them unsheathing the sword. They should be bloody grateful we didn't apply to them what they applied to others. In all consideration of WWII, the bulk of the Germans were lucky to have been occupied by the western allies. Defeat has its consequences and they escaped the consequences that history has written of for millenia.
Posted by: Mikey
at August 25, 2007 1:39 PM
Yes, we're still paying for them unsheathing the sword. They should be bloody grateful we didn't apply to them what they applied to others. In all consideration of WWII, the bulk of the Germans were lucky to have been occupied by the western allies. Defeat has its consequences and they escaped the consequences that history has written of for millenia.
Another bloodthristy Brit looking for unborn Nazis to kill in the womb.
Posted by: expat at August 30, 2007 1:51 PM