July 30, 2007

FUNNY HOW THAT WORKS...:

A War We Just Might Win (MICHAEL E. O’HANLON and KENNETH M. POLLACK, 7/30/07, NY Times)

VIEWED from Iraq, where we just spent eight days meeting with American and Iraqi military and civilian personnel, the political debate in Washington is surreal. The Bush administration has over four years lost essentially all credibility. Yet now the administration’s critics, in part as a result, seem unaware of the significant changes taking place.

Here is the most important thing Americans need to understand: We are finally getting somewhere in Iraq, at least in military terms. As two analysts who have harshly criticized the Bush administration’s miserable handling of Iraq, we were surprised by the gains we saw and the potential to produce not necessarily “victory” but a sustainable stability that both we and the Iraqis could live with. [...]

In addition, far more Iraqi units are well integrated in terms of ethnicity and religion. The Iraqi Army’s highly effective Third Infantry Division started out as overwhelmingly Kurdish in 2005. Today, it is 45 percent Shiite, 28 percent Kurdish, and 27 percent Sunni Arab.

In the past, few Iraqi units could do more than provide a few “jundis” (soldiers) to put a thin Iraqi face on largely American operations. Today, in only a few sectors did we find American commanders complaining that their Iraqi formations were useless — something that was the rule, not the exception, on a previous trip to Iraq in late 2005.

The additional American military formations brought in as part of the surge, General Petraeus’s determination to hold areas until they are truly secure before redeploying units, and the increasing competence of the Iraqis has had another critical effect: no more whack-a-mole, with insurgents popping back up after the Americans leave.

In war, sometimes it’s important to pick the right adversary, and in Iraq we seem to have done so. A major factor in the sudden change in American fortunes has been the outpouring of popular animus against Al Qaeda and other Salafist groups, as well as (to a lesser extent) against Moktada al-Sadr’s Mahdi Army.

These groups have tried to impose Shariah law, brutalized average Iraqis to keep them in line, killed important local leaders and seized young women to marry off to their loyalists. The result has been that in the last six months Iraqis have begun to turn on the extremists and turn to the Americans for security and help. The most important and best-known example of this is in Anbar Province, which in less than six months has gone from the worst part of Iraq to the best (outside the Kurdish areas). Today the Sunni sheiks there are close to crippling Al Qaeda and its Salafist allies. Just a few months ago, American marines were fighting for every yard of Ramadi; last week we strolled down its streets without body armor.

Another surprise was how well the coalition’s new Embedded Provincial Reconstruction Teams are working. Wherever we found a fully staffed team, we also found local Iraqi leaders and businessmen cooperating with it to revive the local economy and build new political structures. Although much more needs to be done to create jobs, a new emphasis on microloans and small-scale projects was having some success where the previous aid programs often built white elephants.


Shi'ite dominated state institutions hostile to Sunni recalcitrants working with American assistance--not a very complez formula, is it?

Posted by Orrin Judd at July 30, 2007 7:54 AM
Comments

Not to be a knee-jerk defender, which I am... but I love the "The Bush administration has over four years lost essentially all credibility."

Does it occur to the authors how much the New York Times et al is responsible for that "loss" as much as the administration per se, and, should, this turnaround be real, can we, with extremely good reason, say that our major media organizations, not to mention so many Democrats, be said to have "lost all credibility" for essentially the same reason.

Posted by: Andrew X at July 30, 2007 2:39 PM

... What it is ain't exactly clear.

Posted by: ghostcat at July 30, 2007 3:18 PM
« WHAT CAN A FOCUS ON ETHNIC IDENTITY PRODUCE BUT HATRED?: | Main | WOTANY, BOTANY, WHAT'S THE DIFF?: »