May 14, 2007

WHAT ABOUT THE GIFT BAN? (via Gene Brown):>Cutting the Grass : Congressional Democrats prepare another assault on the First Amendment. (John Fund, May 14, 2007, Opinion Journal)

A recent Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll shows 6 in 10 Americans think the Democratic Congress "hasn't brought much change." Eager to change this impression, the Democrats are frantically trying to pass legislation before Memorial Day. First on the agenda is a bill restricting lobbying, which is heading for the House floor with lightning speed. The House Judiciary Committee is expected to pass it tomorrow, sending it to the full House for a final vote next Tuesday or Wednesday.

When a bill moves that quickly, you can bet an someone will try make some last-minute mischief. Hardly anyone objects to the legislation's requirement that former lawmakers wait two years instead of one before lobbying Congress. Ditto with bans on lobbying by congressional spouses and restrictions on sitting members of Congress negotiating contracts with private entities for future employment.

But the legislation may be amended on the floor to restrict grassroots groups that encourage citizens to contact members of Congress. The amendment, pushed by Rep. Marty Meehan of Massachusetts, would require groups that organize such grassroots campaigns to register as "lobbyists" and file detailed quarterly reports on their donors and activities. The law would apply to any group that took in at least $100,000 in any given quarter for "paid communications campaigns" aimed at mobilizing the public. [...]

But the First Amendment specifically prohibits Congress from abridging "the right of the people . . . To petition the Government for redress of grievances." The Supreme Court twice ruled in the 1950s that grassroots communication isn't "lobbying activity," and is fully protected by the First Amendment. Among the groups that believe the Meehan proposal would trample on the First Amendment are the National Right to Life Committee and the American Civil Liberties Union. The idea goes too far even for Sen. John McCain, who voted to strip a similar provision from a Senate lobbying reform bill last January.

It's almost as if the Democrats were trying to figure out how to get Maverick in good with the base and whip up anger at Hillary and Obama.

Posted by Orrin Judd at May 14, 2007 7:39 AM

These bans are nonsense. Clintonistas had no trouble getting around the five year wait put into place by Bush père.

Posted by: erp at May 14, 2007 7:50 AM

And don't forget the push by such luminaries as Grand Admiral Pelosi and Peace Marshal Kucinich to reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine. Is there any policy that the Progressive Left wants that hasn't been tried and failed, or was thought up new in the last decade?

(Here's the un-Judded link to the article.)

Posted by: Raoul Ortega at May 14, 2007 10:52 AM