May 9, 2007

THE IMPLICIT ALLIANCE:

Inside Sadr City (Pepe Escobar , 5/10/07, Asia Times)

Sadr City is a giant dormitory. Hussein says, "Baghdad would become a ghost city if people from Sadr City would not go there to work." He adds, "Sadr City has become the symbol of stability for Baghdad and Iraq. Many merchants in Baghdad come from Sadr City." Community life is indeed stable; this is a peaceful, harmonious dormitory. Hussein describes local people as "naive, they accept everything, they have a great sense of sacrifice". Residents confirm they feel secure inside Sadr City, but never outside. They are not in the habit of complaining; a common expression is Sali ala al-Nabi ("Pray for the Prophet"), meaning in the end everything will be all right.

Take Hussein Maheidel, from Amara in Shi'ite southern Iraq, who has been living in Sadr City for the past 30 years. He was a construction worker, but has been handicapped for the past 12 years because of a nerve problem in his back. All the best Iraqi doctors have left the country, so an operation might not be successful.

He has no pension to support his family of nine children. So he's being helped by the office of Muqtada, who pays his monthly rent of $100, a figure considered low in Sadr City. The average monthly rental for a house in the neighborhood is $750.

The Maheidel family lives in bleak poverty and sleeps in the same small room. But the head of the household is not complaining. He hopes his children "will not be workers, like myself". They are all in school; the unfortunate exception is his six-year-old daughter, who spends the day caring for her father (he walks on crutches). The expression of infinite sadness in her eyes is extremely disturbing. There are polite smiles in Sadr City - but the impression is they are directed to the foreign visitor. Resignation in sadness seems to be the feeling among most adults.


All of which is why the surge is directed at the Sunni, not Mookie.

Posted by Orrin Judd at May 9, 2007 12:00 AM
Comments

Of course the Sunni are the primary target. But Mookie is a heretic and a devil within the Shi'a, no? By the philosophical standards of this site, he is a witch and deserves what is coming to him.

BTW, there are two Shi'a factions fighting it out in the South (following the British pullback), one aligned to Al-Maliki and the government and one alinged to al-Sadr. Who should win?

Posted by: jim hamlen at May 9, 2007 7:41 AM

Hardly. He has the support of the Shi'a hierarchy, which is why we cut the deal.

Posted by: oj at May 9, 2007 8:57 AM

Mookie wants to be Khomeini. Supporting Mookie is like supporting the Khomeini Marxist version of Islam, which has been none too healthy for the Shi'a. When Sistani dies, Mookie will swoop in and try to claim his 'prize'. Kill him now.

Posted by: jim hamlen at May 9, 2007 2:12 PM

No, he wants to be Sistani. Considering where the Shi'a were pre-Khomeini he was fabulous for them. Now they're just evolving past him. It's an entirely typical arc.

Posted by: oj at May 9, 2007 2:46 PM

I understand your point, but Mookie doesn't seem all that interested in theology. If all he wanted was to be Sistani, he wouldn't have probably the biggest private army in Iraq.

Posted by: jim hamlen at May 9, 2007 11:37 PM

Then who'd protect the Shi'a?

Posted by: oj at May 10, 2007 1:02 PM
« NOTHING COSTS MORE THAN IT USED TO: | Main | OUGHTTA SHOOT CARS INSTEAD: »