May 14, 2007
IF BY "COMPLICATED" YOU MEAN SIMPLE:
Antiwar Iraqi in Washington Has a More Sectarian Agenda at Home (SCOTT SHANE and EDWARD WONG, 5/14/07, NY Times)
As Congress and the White House continue to spar over war plans, Iraqis representing all sides in the conflict are turning up in the halls of power here to press their views.For two weeks, in meetings with a score of members of Congress, Muhammad al-Daini, a Sunni Arab member of the Iraqi Parliament who says he has survived eight assassination attempts, has offered a well-practiced pitch that emphasizes the need for American troops to withdraw.
“The problem in Iraq is the American Army,” Mr. Daini told a group of attentive American legislators gathered last week in the office of Representative Jim McDermott, an antiwar Democrat from Seattle. “What brought terrorism, what brought Al Qaeda and what brought Iranian influence is the Americans.”
Mr. Daini, soft-spoken and generally unsmiling, has been ushered from meeting to meeting by a public relations firm paid by an American businessman who calls the Iraqi politician “a true humanitarian.” The businessman, Dal LaMagna, says he is devoting the fortune he made selling his high-end grooming tools business, Tweezerman, to seeking an end to the violence in Iraq, a goal he says Mr. Daini shares.
But a closer look at Mr. Daini’s record in Iraq suggests a more complicated picture.
The notion that you need to think overmuch about the fact that a Ba'athist opposes the Shi'a is ludicrous. Posted by Orrin Judd at May 14, 2007 8:58 AM
Watch out for guys like this funneling compaign contributions to one of the major parties, we can't imagine which one, through a Bhuddist temple or something
Posted by: Lou Gots at May 14, 2007 11:47 AMWhen we left, and the Sunnis annihilated by the Shiites, the same Sunni sages and Democrats would blame the US for not staying around to protect the minority Sunnis.
We should withdraw to protect the Iraqi borders and let the indigenous Shiites and Sunnies fight it out. They like to "martyr" for their causes anyway, let them do it. Worse for them, better for us.
Posted by: ic at May 14, 2007 1:35 PMIf they can use 'antiwar' in that headline without quoting it, their confusion about his 'ulterior' motives is unsurprising.
Posted by: Mike Earl at May 14, 2007 2:09 PM