May 10, 2007

HMMMMM:

Sarkozy's proposal for Mediterranean bloc makes waves (Katrin Bennhold, May 10, 2007, International Herald Tribune)

A proposal by Nicolas Sarkozy to gather the European, Middle Eastern, and North African countries of the strategic Mediterranean rim into an economic community along the lines of the early European Union has begun making waves even before the president-elect takes office.

The initiative, outlined by Sarkozy in a campaign speech in February, went largely unnoticed until he repeated it in his electoral victory address Sunday evening. Plans are still being drawn up, Sarkozy's aides said Thursday, but even at this early stage the proposal has cascading implications for the region. [...]

Sarkozy, who takes office next week, has said that he wants the countries ringing the Mediterranean - Portugal, Spain, France, Italy, Greece, Cyprus, Malta, Turkey, Lebanon, Israel, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco - to form a council and hold regular summit meetings under a rotating presidency.

He wants to anchor regional cooperation in the fields of energy, security, counter-terrorism and immigration on a trade agreement, and create a Mediterranean Investment Bank, modeled on the European Investment Bank, that would help develop the economies on the eastern and southern edge of the region. He has offered French expertise on nuclear energy in return for access to North Africa's gas reserves.

"The time has come to build together a Mediterranean Union that will be the bridge between Europe and Africa," Sarkozy said in his victory speech Sunday.


That one had escaped our notice and seems to have certain drawbacks if France is, as we assume it will be, unable to shake free of the French model--anyone have any thoughts? Is there any reason to believe such a bloc would help Sarkozy in his task?

Posted by Orrin Judd at May 10, 2007 10:52 PM
Comments

Maybe his goal is to break the French model by putting even more stress on it.

I think that works here, where things are pretty dynamic, but I don't see how it helps France, which is already overloaded with welfare cases and no jobs.

Hard to figure.

Posted by: Bruno at May 11, 2007 7:04 AM

It doesnt necessarily help France, but it would be interesting to see how he gets the Israelis and Libyans, for example, around the same table. IF he could achieve the task of getting the Maghreb countries and Lebanon to sit down annually with Israel (excepting Morocco which has always had good relations with Israel) he has achieved something tangible towards easing tensions. Equally as complex and interesting--which portion of Cyprus does he propose to seat at this table?

Posted by: cornetofhorse at May 11, 2007 8:07 AM

I think it is an effort to (a) create a counter-weight to the EU, where French influence has declined precipitously since the Eastern Europeans entered, and (b) create a replacement for the EU where France will have over-sized influence, due to its ties of language and history with North Africa and the Middle East, and its middle position as a half-European, half-Arab country. It's basically the EU idea in a different context. By being in both groups, the French can play one off against the other. And it gives him something to offer Turkey in place of EU membership, which he opposes.

Posted by: pj at May 11, 2007 9:49 AM

And the counterweight to US.

They never, never, EVER change.

Posted by: Sandy P at May 11, 2007 6:48 PM
« NOTHING MORE LIKELY...: | Main | TALK ABOUT DAMNING WITH FAINT PRAISE...: »