April 30, 2007

WHICH RAISES THE QUESTION...:

Keep Foot On, Or Chaos and "Shiastan" (Leon Krauze, 4/30/07, PostGlobal)

Four years ago, George W. Bush opened Pandora’s Box. And now there is no realistic way to put the lid back on.

For a while now, there have been only two possible outcomes in Iraq: the bad and the worse. Which is the latter and how to avoid it? The worst outcome for Iraq would be a full-scale civil war that ends in the country’s partition. There is little question that, once the American forces leave, the country will become a far bloodier and more lawless battleground than it is now.

Once that happens, I see no reason why Moqtada al-Sadr and other Shiite strongmen would seek any kind of compromise with Sunni leaders in a pluralist government. Outright Shia domination of Iraq should never be allowed.


...of why Mexicans should be allowed to dominate Mexico.

Posted by Orrin Judd at April 30, 2007 9:33 AM
Comments

Outright Shia domination of Iraq should never be allowed.

But outright Sunni domination of Iraq was the minority's birth right?

Posted by: ic at April 30, 2007 1:32 PM
Outright Shia domination of Iraq should never be allowed.

...but Dubya is the guy who's unrealistic?

Posted by: Matt Murphy at April 30, 2007 6:39 PM

Mexicans don't dominate Mexico and that's part of the problem.

Posted by: Sandy P at April 30, 2007 7:43 PM

You can't be serious, Mr. Judd.

Posted by: Leon Krauze at May 2, 2007 10:59 PM
« A HEALTHY RECOGNITION THAT CATHOLICISM IS IRRECONCILABLE WITH LIBERALISM: | Main | MAHMOUD NO LONGER MATTERS: »