April 9, 2007

OTHER THAN THAT HOW'D YOU ENJOY THE WAR...:

Revisiting US involvement in the Second World War (David T. Pyne, 4/6/2007, Enter Stage Right)

It is my contention that many of the assumptions we have been taught by Liberal Establishment historians about US involvement in the Second World War are incorrect. Specifically fourteen points present themselves: [...]

3. The Soviet Union, not Nazi Germany, represented the greater threat to Western civilization and to US/UK national security. Due to the fact that the Soviet Union was a co-aggressor with Nazi Germany that invaded Poland and started the war, the Allies should have considered declaring war on the USSR as well or at the very least not allying with the Evil Soviet Empire and providing it with massive military aid enabling it to conquer the eastern half of Europe and most of Asia as they ended up doing. During the period from 1939-1940, Soviet dictator Josef Stalin invaded and/or annexed parts or the whole of six countries to the USSR the same number as was invaded by Hitler during the same period. Furthermore, at the time of the formation of the Grand Alliance between the US & UK on the one hand and the USSR on the other, Stalin had killed up to one-hundred times as many innocents as had Hitler. Thus, contrary to popular perception, Stalin, not Hitler was the greater evil at the time. Hitler having declared war on the United States on December 11, 1941, instead of allying with the Soviets the Allies should have signed a non-aggression pact with Stalin and raced the Soviets to overrun as much of Europe as possible in order to liberate the captive nations from totalitarian control, not merely hand them over from one murderous totalitarian occupying power to another. [...]

5. The war could have been ended far sooner had the Allies not insisted on unconditional surrender, the prolongation of the war that benefited no one but Stalin and had they not refused to support the anti-Hitler resistance which included a great many of the top Field Marshals and senior generals of the German Army.

6. FDR's and Truman's insistence in prolonging the Pacific War long enough to allow the Soviets to intervene armed with US tanks, planes and artillery provided to them for the purpose and occupy Japanese-controlled territories in northern Japan, northern Korea and northern China was one of the main reasons that the Communists were able to seize control of mainland China. This disastrous policy led to the loss of 450 million (now 1.3 billion) Chinese to Communist control and to the Korean and Vietnamese wars which cost the lives of nearly 100,000 Americans.

7. The Yalta agreement at which Churchill and FDR agreed to surrender 140 million eastern Europeans in nearly a dozen countries to Soviet control represented the greatest appeasement of evil mass murdering dictators and the greatest betrayal of freedom in world history, dwarfing the transfer of 3.5 million Sudeten Germans to Germany under the terms of the Munich Pact.

8. Operation Keelhaul--the forcible transfer of 2-6 million anti-Communist freedom fighters and their families to be killed at the hands of Stalin and his henchmen--was another great betrayal of freedom and war crime committed by Allied leaders including Churchill, Truman and Eisenhower.


Bottom line: Letting Hitler and Stalin fight it out would likely have led to a better outcome than helping Stalin win. We could always have just fought the winner, in the unlikely event there was one.

Posted by Orrin Judd at April 9, 2007 12:00 AM
Comments

What was the source of this article?

Posted by: pj at April 9, 2007 9:26 AM

The article is full of nonsense.

Had the Polish corridor not been handed over to Poland by the Allies in 1919 in violation of President Woodrow Wilson's stated principle of national self-determination, Hitler would have had no territorial claims against Poland thus likely averting his perceived need for a German invasion of Poland entirely.

Point XIII: An independent Polish state should be erected which should include the territories inhabited by indisputably Polish populations, which should be assured a free and secure access to the sea, and whose political and economic independence and territorial integrity should be guaranteed by international covenant.

There's more than just that silliness. There's the old nonsense about FDR causing Japan to attack, about Hitler not wanting to fight the West, blah, blah, blah.

It would have been nice to let Hitler and Stalin fight it out. But it wasn't entirely within our power to make that happen.

Posted by: Brandon at April 9, 2007 12:28 PM

Brandon:

It's undeniable that FDR wanted Japan to attack, which is why he provoked them. The problem is he was such a racist he underestimated how powerful the attack would be. Luckily, it was still rather feeble.

Hitler wanted to fight the French, just on general principle. He didn't want to fight the West, which he thought Germanic.

Posted by: oj at April 9, 2007 1:00 PM

OJ,

It is deniable that FDR wanted the Japanese to attack and that he provoked them - if reactions to Japanese agression can even be considered provocation.

If Hitler didn't want to fight Britain and the US, why'd he declare war on both of them?

Posted by: Brandon at April 9, 2007 2:14 PM

Brandon:

Sorry. I meant it's not deniable by anyone historically informed.

Because they declared war on him.

Posted by: oj at April 9, 2007 2:32 PM

oj, play nice now.

Posted by: erp [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 10, 2007 2:51 PM
« LET THE MAN ROLL THROUGH: | Main | ABERRATIONS TO BE REPAIRED: »