March 12, 2007
SHARESIES?:
Blood and Oil: Three cheers for Iraq's new hydrocarbon law (Christopher Hitchens, March 12, 2007, Slate)
The recent hydrocarbon law, approved after much wrangling by Iraq's council of ministers, deserves a great deal more praise than it has been receiving. For one thing, it abolishes the economic rationale for dictatorship in Iraq. For another, it was arrived at by a process of parley and bargain that, while still in its infancy, demonstrates the possibility of a cooperative future. For still another, it shames the oil policy of Iraq's neighbors and reinforces the idea that a democracy in Baghdad could still teach a few regional lessons.Posted by Orrin Judd at March 12, 2007 7:32 PMTo illustrate my point by contrast: Can you easily imagine the Saudi government allocating oil revenues so as to give a fair share to the ground-down and despised Shiite workers who toil, for the most part, in the oil fields of the western region of the country? Or picture the Shiite dictatorship in Iran giving a fair shake to the Arab-speaking area of Khuzestan, let alone to the 10 percent of Iranians who are both Sunni and Kurdish? To ask these questions is to answer them. Control over the production and distribution of oil is the decisive factor in defining who rules whom in the Middle East.
Wouldn't Slate not care at all about oil development, production and distribution since it runs counter to Al Gore's global warming hysteria? Shouldn't they be poo-pooing the Iraqis and instead praise the Iranians, Mexicans and Venezuelans for decreasing their oil output, while at the same time screwing their economies, thus lowering their carbon emissions?
Posted by: KRS at March 12, 2007 10:24 PM