March 29, 2007
POLICY IS JUST POLITICS PUT INTO EFFECT:
Former Justice official defends firings: The attorney general's former chief of staff testifies today before Congress about the role of politics in dismissals. (Richard B. Schmitt and Richard Simon, March 29, 2007, LA Times)
The former Justice Department official who orchestrated the firing of eight U.S. attorneys last year plans to tell Congress today that such dismissals are appropriate when prosecutors prove ineffective from "a political perspective."In his first public remarks on the firings, D. Kyle Sampson says the process of identifying underperforming U.S. attorneys "was not scientific nor was it extensively documented," according to testimony prepared for delivery to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
None of the prosecutors was asked to resign for "improper reasons," notes a copy of Sampson's statement obtained by The Times, but an unusually broad standard was used to decide on proper grounds for dismissing them.
"The distinction between 'political' and 'performance-related' reasons for removing a United States attorney is, in my view, largely artificial," Sampson says, noting that a federal prosecutor who falls down on the job from a political perspective is "unsuccessful."
An employee of the Executive who refuses to follow the political line laid out for him is, by definition, not performing his job well. Posted by Orrin Judd at March 29, 2007 6:45 AM
The politcally based firings of political appointees has resulted in allegations that this was improper. Therefore, one of the most political bodies in the nation will now conduct show trials - I mean, hearings - to determine how many other political appointees from another political branch of government ought to be fired or jailed.
I think that about covers it.
Posted by: Mikey![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://brothersjuddblog.com/nav-commenters.gif)
Wasn't management of his subordinates the pretext used to get Andrew Johnson impeached by the Radical Republicans? Is it surprising that the modern (and historically ignorant) Copperheads are engaged in similar stunts 140 years later? (We're getting to see what the real Copperheads would have done to Lincoln if they'd acheived power.)
Posted by: Raoul Ortega at March 29, 2007 11:41 AM