February 19, 2007
WHICH STILL LEAVES THE MAIN QUESTION UNASKED:
Iraqi Sunni Lands Show New Oil and Gas Promise (JAMES GLANZ, 2/19/07, NY Times)
Huge petroleum deposits have long been known in Iraq's Kurdish north and Shiite south. But now, Iraq has substantially increased its estimates of the amount of oil and natural gas in deposits on Sunni lands after quietly paying foreign oil companies tens of millions of dollars over the past two years to re-examine old seismic data across the country and retrain Iraqi petroleum engineers.The development is likely to have significant political effects: the lack of natural resources in the central and western regions where Sunnis hold sway has fed their disenchantment with the nation they once ruled. And it has driven their insistence on a strong central government, one that would collect oil revenues and spread them equitably among the country's factions, rather than any division of the country along sectarian regional boundaries.
Though Western and Iraqi engineers have always known that there are oil formations beneath Sunni lands, the issue is coming into sharper focus with the new studies, senior Oil Ministry officials said. The question of where the oil reserves are concentrated is taking on still more importance as it appears that negotiators are close to agreement on a long-debated oil law that would regulate how Iraqi and international oil companies would be allowed to develop Iraq's fields.
The new studies have increased estimates of the amount of oil in a series of deposits in Sunni territory to the north and east of Baghdad and in a series of deposits that run through western Iraq like beads on a string, and could contain as much as a trillion cubic feet of natural gas.
The division of Iraq is inevitable, because the Kurds consider themselves a nation already, but scenarios that envision a tripartite division fail to ask a basic question: why should the Shi'a grant the Sunni an independent state in their midst?
Posted by Orrin Judd at February 19, 2007 9:18 AM
Then why should Israel do the same?
Posted by: Bartman at February 19, 2007 9:59 AMBecause a collective of interests wishes to see the Sunni and Shi'a in Iraq fight each other to the death.
It's hard to have too much sympathy for the Iraqi Sunnis need for a homeland when you take a look at a map of the distribution of Sunni and Shi'a across the world. A huge expanse of Sunni followers from Morroco to Indonesia, and tiny island of Shi'a in eastern Iraq and all of Iran. If I was Iran, I would probably start developing some powerful defense mechanisms....
Why should Serbia?
Posted by: erp at February 19, 2007 11:34 AMIf the Israelis have the will to exterminate the Arabs then they needn't. Of course, such an Israel wouldn't be worth having, but....
Posted by: oj at February 19, 2007 12:57 PM"why should the Shi'a grant the Sunni an independent state in their midst?" Grant? Why should Sunni ruled by the Shi'a? Ans: to avoid sectarian wars.
