February 6, 2007

THE IDEAL CONSERVATIVE PROGRAM: RETAINING SOVEREIGNTY; TAXING CONSUMPTION; FORCING INNOVATION

Global Warming Is a Real Problem: The Kyoto accords aren't the solution (Anne Applebaum, Feb. 6, 2007, Slate)

Any real, lasting solutions will have to be extremely simple, and--because of the high cost implicit in reducing the use and emissions of fossil fuels--will also have to benefit those countries that impose them in other ways. Fortunately, there is such a solution, one that is grippingly unoriginal, requires no special knowledge of economics, and is extremely easy for any country to apply. It's called a carbon tax, and it should be applied across the board to every industry that uses fossil fuels, every home or building with a heating system, every motorist, and every public transportation system. Immediately, it would produce a wealth of innovations designed to save fuel, as well as new incentives to conserve. More to the point, it would produce a big chunk of money that could be used for other things. Anyone for balancing the budget? Fixing Social Security for future generations? Cutting income tax dramatically? As a little foreign-policy side benefit, users of the tax would suddenly find themselves less dependent on Gulf oil or Russian gas.

Most of all, though, the successful use of carbon taxes does not require "American leadership," or a U.N. committee, or indeed any complicated international effort of any kind. It can be done country by country: If the British environment minister or the German chancellor wants to go ahead with it tomorrow or the next day, nothing is stopping them. If a future U.S. president wants to call on the nation to rally around a truly patriotic and noble cause, then he or she has the perfect opportunity.


Posted by Orrin Judd at February 6, 2007 8:24 AM
Comments

I don't see anything about getting my carbon taxes refunded when it turns out that global warming was a crock.

Posted by: Bob Hawkins at February 6, 2007 9:00 AM

The policy has nothing to do with warming. It's simple neoconomics.

Posted by: oj at February 6, 2007 10:46 AM

So you're just running a straightforward con?

You realize, this is how global warming got started, as a Thatcherite scam. When Maggie became PM, her people were concerned that she wouldn't be taken seriously by other heads of state, since her previous experience was rather thin, and of course the sex thing. She didn't have much of a resume, but she had one thing no other head of a major state could claim: a degree in a hard science, chemistry.

So her people looked for something scientific that could be inflated into a global issue. Then Maggie could look down her nose at them when the topic was discussed, and get on an even level. Global warming research was going on in England in well-deserved obscurity, but when the rest of the budget was being slashed, money for global warming was increased, and the spotlight directed to it.

Well, I don't know how much global warming contributed to her standing with other world leaders, and how much she would have managed anyway. The issue was taken over by others, for other purposes, and here we are.

You may be eager to get on that tiger's back, rather than make the actual case for the policies you like. I prefer to shoot the tiger and have it stuffed, and make the case for my policies.

Posted by: Bob Hawkins at February 6, 2007 11:58 AM

Yes, like the Y2K hoax, which has given us record productivity growth by forcing modernzation of computer systems. Warming is just a tool.

Posted by: oj at February 6, 2007 3:33 PM
« EVERYTHING WILL BE DIFFERENT...: | Main | MORE LIKE US: »