February 22, 2007
IN CASE YOU THOUGHT FRANCE BACKSTABBING US IN THE WoT MIGHT BE PRINCIPLED:
In French Campaign, Immigrants Find a Voice: Voter Registration Soars After '05 Suburban Riots (Molly Moore, 2/22/07, Washington Post)
Sixteen months after immigrant neighborhoods exploded in the country's worst civil unrest in nearly half a century, the suburbs are emerging for the first time as a potent force in the presidential campaign.Immigrant citizens and their first-generation French children have registered to vote in unprecedented numbers, forcing politicians to address a potential voter pool previously written off as politically insignificant.
Thousands of small, vocal political action groups representing Africans, Arabs and young people have sprung up in suburbs across the country, fledgling challengers to the political monopolies of unions and other establishment organizations.
Grass-roots blogs and Web sites are scrutinizing candidate records, becoming sassy and candid alternatives to the nation's mainstream news media.
"The suburban vote is very important," Bayrou, a three-time presidential contender, said in an interview after surprising commuters when he and his media entourage crammed onto a train for the 25-minute ride from Paris to Mantes-la-Jolie. "I'm not naturally a candidate of the suburbs, my constituency historically is rural -- but I am here."
Addressing DiscriminationThe suburban violence that stunned the nation and besmirched France's image across the globe not only fueled greater political activism in the immigrant neighborhoods but also has forced presidential candidates to confront issues previously considered politically taboo: racial, ethnic and religious discrimination.
A recent survey commissioned by a black advocacy group, the Representative Council of Black Associations, and conducted by the TNS-Sofres polling firm, found that 61 percent of blacks polled said they are victimized by discrimination on a daily basis. France has no blacks in its legislative National Assembly other than the 10 representatives from its overseas departments that are predominantly black. [...]
In contrast to the United States, France has concentrated its immigrant and poor populations in the suburbs rather than the inner cities.
Suburban issues have dominated the presidential campaign of Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy, candidate of the ruling center-right Union for a Popular Movement party. Many critics blame him for inflaming the suburbs during the fall 2005 violence when he referred to some youths as "scum" that should be washed out of the neighborhoods.
He has since tried to ameliorate the anger and has appointed an Algerian-born Muslim, Abderrahmane Dahmane, to the position of "national secretary in charge of relations with associations involved in French immigration issues."
But Sarkozy is not expected to draw many votes among immigrants in the suburbs, according to most opinion polls and political analysts.
Dahmane tries to play down the importance of the populace Sarkozy has asked him to oversee: "These communities don't vote a lot; they talk a lot but they don't vote," he said.
That could change this year.
Voter registration has skyrocketed in every French demographic group and nearly every district -- urban, suburban and rural. Across the country, voter registration is up nearly 50 percent over the last presidential election in 2002, according to preliminary figures. In some localities, the number of new voters increased more than 300 percent, according to tallies by the daily newspaper Le Monde.
Analysts and political activists say the increase in voter registration was the result of two events that shocked the country: the 2005 suburban violence and Le Pen's second-place showing in the last election.
Reportedly, policy makers in the U.S. government discount the idea of getting any help from Europe in the Middle East because government there are too afraid of their own populations. Posted by Orrin Judd at February 22, 2007 12:00 AM
How did the French actually backstab America in the WoT? They have contributed to the Afghan campaign, because there were and are terrorists in Afghanistan, but they refused to participate in the Iraq catastrophe because the invasion had nothing to do with the WoT.
Posted by: Mörkö at February 22, 2007 6:19 PMSaddam mattered. Al Qaeda didn't.
Posted by: oj at February 22, 2007 9:26 PMSo the invasion to Afghanistan was unnecessary? Whether Saddam "mattered" or not can be debated, but in any case he was an asset in the WoT, not a liability.
Posted by: Mörkö at February 23, 2007 3:09 AMWhat invasion?
Posted by: oj at February 23, 2007 7:01 AMYour problem is that you are incapable of conciding a point even when you have been proved blatantly wrong (which is often).
Posted by: Mörkö at February 23, 2007 12:02 PMhow many troops invaded Afghanistan? There was no force to contribute to. It was a worthwhile exercise but not a serious military mission.
Replacing Saddam was the one that mattered and the French, after promising to back us, stabbed us at the UN.
You Eurotrash are always so eager for us to save you but will never help anyone else.
Posted by: oj at February 23, 2007 12:32 PMI don't feel like playing your silly semantic games.
Posted by: Mörkö at February 23, 2007 1:17 PM