February 4, 2007
IF DAD HAD HIS BRAIN WASHED, MITT'S GOING TO HAVE HIS CLOCK CLEANED:
McCain's Advisers Once Made Ads That Drew His Ire (JIM RUTENBERG, 2/04/07, NY Times)
In 2000, Mr. McCain, Republican of Arizona, said the advertisements run against him by George W. Bush, then the governor of Texas, distorted his record. But he has hired three members of the team that made those commercials -- Mark McKinnon, Russell Schriefer and Stuart Stevens -- to work on his presidential campaign.In 2004, Mr. McCain said the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth advertisement asserting that Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts had not properly earned his medals from the Vietnam War was "dishonest and dishonorable." Nonetheless, he has hired the firm that made the spots, Stevens Reed Curcio & Potholm, which worked on his 2000 campaign, to work for him again this year.
In October, Mr. McCain's top adviser expressed public displeasure with an advertisement against former Representative Harold E. Ford Jr., Democrat of Tennessee, that some saw as having racist overtones for suggesting a flirtation between Mr. Ford, who is black, and a young, bare-shouldered white woman, played by a blond actress.
The Republican committee that sponsored the spot had as its leader Terry Nelson, a former Bush campaign strategist whom Mr. McCain hired as an adviser last spring. In December, just weeks after the Ford controversy broke, Mr. McCain elevated Mr. Nelson to the position of national campaign manager.
Taken together, the moves provide the strongest indication yet that Mr. McCain intends to run a far tougher campaign than the one he ran in the 2000 primary. And they come as he transitions from being a onetime maverick to a candidate seeking to gather his party around him and create an air of inevitability about his prospects for winning nomination.
As Mr. McCain assembles his team, he is also making it that much harder for his Republican challengers by scooping up a significant circle of the party's top talent.
You barely need pros to do the ads that take out Rudy Giuliani. Posted by Orrin Judd at February 4, 2007 8:56 AM
McCain's opposition to the swiftboating of Kerry may be personal. He may be concerned that an equivalent to swiftboaters will come forward to tell what they know about his time as a POW. Certainly rumors have been swirling around for decades.
Posted by: erp at February 4, 2007 11:00 AMSo, McCain's heroic maverickness is gone, absorbed by a Hillary-like lust for power. And we thought everything was going to be different.
If Rudy really wants the job, he will win. Republicans aren't going to vote for a hypocritical war hero who will opt out of the rules that mark his 'greatest political achievement'. Someone called him "McVain" here the other day - that about sums it up.
And if McCain does lose in the primaries, whoever is running better be prepared to crush him, because the press and the Democrats will stoke those third-party fires like never before.
Posted by: ratbert at February 4, 2007 1:06 PMThe other day I had the pleasure (here in Arizona) of hanging up on a McVain volunteer asking for a financial contribution, after giving him an earful. He was speechless but didn't seem that surprised. Johnnie boy may share with Algore the distinction of not even carrying his own state.
Posted by: jd watson at February 4, 2007 2:10 PMConservatives can squack all they want about McCain, but he is the only one who delivered the federal judges for them. With Frist, Alle, Santorum and Brownback running the show in the Senate, all the judges were stuck there for years. The morons could not even get a vote for Owens, Brown and the like. It is only when McCain, along with Lieberman, stepped in that they got through.
Not that the Rabid Right will ever recognize the facts. Right now, they are in such a pathetic state that they are alternatively courting Giuliani (whose positions are a carbon copy of the Democratic Party platform) and Romney ( a religious cultist who changes his positions depending on which office he is running for), when not pining for ciphers such as Brownback, Gingrich, Huckabee and Tancredo.
In their stupidity, the Rabid Right does not even recognize that it is Rudy, not McCain, who is laying the groundworks for an independent run. He has filed for his exploratory exercise, and has deliberately not indcated his political party.
Posted by: sam at February 4, 2007 2:27 PMChildish petulance is going to cost us everything. We need to keep reminding ourselves that the components of a winning coalition must practice mutual respect and deference.
The stakes are as great as world war. The peace-creep left is going to maneuver Middle East policy as though Israel is to be abandoned. Deal after futile deal is going to be made until all the babies are out of the sled and the wolves close in.
In the end the country will not be able to chew the Israel arm off to get out of the trap, and there will be war.
Those tempted to shatter the Republican coalition over their wish to throw the Christians to the lions would do well to consider these things.
Posted by: Lou Gots at February 4, 2007 2:40 PMLou, where will opponents for an all out war come from? Not one nation on earth can come close to matching us and we won't be standing still while we wait for them to catch up, as if they ever could.
If the dems get back in in perpetuity, there won't be a war, the whole world, including the Islamists, will sink into the dreary poverty of socialism.
Posted by: erp at February 4, 2007 2:49 PMIf Rove didn't use it it doesn't exist.
Posted by: oj
at February 4, 2007 3:46 PM
Erp, the problem is that the axis of weasels, foreign and domestic live in a dream world in which our weapons are "illegal" or at least not to be used without a permission slip. This enables aggressors to tempt annihilation. Having been given the sort of guarantee that the November criminals gave the North Vietnamese at the time of the greater Dolchstoss, they will attack Israel and the result will be millions of deaths.
The very point of my original comment is that the enemies' delusion will make war necessary. Yes, we can kill all of them easily, but the peace-creep gambit is what is going to make it necessary to do so,
Posted by: Lou Gots at February 4, 2007 6:09 PMYes, but if we really go all out, the peaceniks will rethink their positions.
Posted by: erp at February 4, 2007 8:48 PM