January 8, 2007
CLARIFYING THE TERMS OF THE ARGUMENT:
Amniotic fluid holds stem cells full of potential, not controversy (Karen Kaplan, 1/08/07, Los Angeles Times)
Researchers have found stem cells in human amniotic fluid that appear to have many of the key benefits of embryonic stem cells while avoiding their knottiest ethical, medical and logistical drawbacks, according to a study published Sunday.The stem cells -- easy to harvest from the fluid left over from amniocentesis tests given to pregnant women -- were able to transform into new bone, heart muscle, blood vessels, fat, nerve and liver tissues, the study said.
"So far, we've been successful with every cell type we've attempted to produce from these stem cells," said Dr. Anthony Atala, director of the Institute for Regenerative Medicine at Wake Forest University School of Medicine in Winston-Salem, N.C., and senior author of the report published online by the journal Nature Biotechnology.
The finding points to a promising avenue of research that sidesteps the hurdles facing embryonic stem-cell research, which has been stymied by moral objections to the destruction of embryos that occurs when cells are harvested.
Most of the work involving human embryonic stem cells is ineligible for the more than $25 billion the federal government spends on research each year. But amniotic-fluid stem-cell studies are already being funded by the National Institutes of Health.
The study also suggests another advantage: Unlike embryonic cells, which can form tumors when implanted in lab animals, amniotic-fluid stem cells do not appear to do so.
Which leaves killing humans as the only reason left to use embryonic cells. Posted by Orrin Judd at January 8, 2007 8:28 AM
And destroying embryos on a whim is all it has ever been about...
Posted by: M. Murcek at January 8, 2007 9:44 AMIt still leaves us with that little problem of cancers caused by embryonic stem cells, versus the lack thereof when using adult stem cells.
Posted by: Ruth H at January 8, 2007 10:00 AMTo give fanatics about embryonic stem cell research a tiny more bit of the benefit of doubt than oj is willing to, their main motivation is to make sure that those scary Christianists lose. As in the Teri Schiavo case.
Posted by: b at January 8, 2007 11:47 AMIt might be worthwhile to take embryonic stem cell research "fanatics" at their word, and accept that their main motivation is developing new therapies against disease. Just as it might be worthwhile if they took the pro-lifers at _their_ word, and accepted that the anti-abortion/stem cell movement is concerned with protecting human life. But that would void a lot of name-calling, which is the _real_ motivation for either side.
Notwithstanding that, the Catholic moral objection to stem cell research remains: embryonic stem cells are capable of developing into human beings. As such, any manipulation of such cells, regardless of their origin, is ethically questionable.
Posted by: M. at January 8, 2007 10:37 PMIt's not. The Death Lobby just wants to demonstrate personal power by killing.
Posted by: oj at January 9, 2007 9:14 AMOh, of course. They're all a bunch of murderers.
You prove the point.
Posted by: M. at January 9, 2007 8:22 PMYes. Women misunderstood their rise to power and believed it needed to be finished off with the exercise of the ultimate power: killing others. They'll get over it.
Posted by: oj at January 9, 2007 8:45 PM