December 24, 2006

FROM THE ARCHIVES: WITH APOLOGIES TO CLEMENT MOORE (OR WHOMEVER)

'Twas late Christmas eve, and in far distant houses
the only sound heard was the clicking of mouses.
With faces awash in the monitors' glow,
the blog readers wondered when Orrin would blow.

Our spouses were restless, alone in their beds,
mild oaths and deprecations danced in their heads.
But addicts won't sign off, we just hit refresh,
awaiting a screed 'gainst a suit on a cr�che.

When out of the ether there came such a clatter,
a dirge that the law was reduced to a tatter.
I opened a Window to post my own bent,
forgot to hit "preview" and misspelled "coment".

The Brothers Judd proved that the ACLU
would surrender the vote 'fore judicial review.
But what to my wondering eyes should appear --
not agreement nor praise, but dissension and fear.

Such a snappy retort, so quick on the parry,
I knew in a moment it must be from Harry,
(though being six hours behind is a cheat),
and soon he and Orrin sought the other to beat:

"Now Darwin!" "Not Darwin;
Prayer and conviction!"
"On, Stalin!" "On, Curia!"
"The Big Spook is fiction!"
The path was well-worn, but
they were having a ball.
each vying to triumph and
dash away all!

The furball expanded, we got from Detroit
some arguments practiced, impassioned, adroit.
These arguments, though, were as wrong as could be,
based on the notion that dad was a monkey.

Some positions fell as the arguments flew,
while others stayed firm, held by logical glue.
We all piled in, joining in on the fight,
though toys needed assembly and wives were uptight.

We heard, from Great Britain and the great Northern waste
(Queen Elizabeth's subjects who hang 'round the place)
a classical argument, based on Burke's wisdom,
for antidisestablishmentarianism.

It got ever later, Christmas soon would be here,
finding commenters groggy and empty of cheer.
I knew in my heart I should stop the commotion,
though I might as well try to hold back the ocean.

The posts kept on coming and the comments came, too.
from Florida, Cambridge and from Kalamazoo.
For my own part I knew the next day would bring
a matinee showing of The Lord Of The Rings

So I got to bed late, knowing I can sleep in,
no church in the morning, nor terrible din.
But gladly I wish you, 'ere I tuck in so tight,

"Happy Christmas to all, and to all a good night!"

[originally posted: 2003-12-24]

Posted by David Cohen at December 24, 2006 10:00 AM
Comments

Mr. Cohen: Lovely. I'm still laughing. Enjoy the matinee!

Posted by: Buttercup at December 24, 2003 8:38 AM

One word: Genius.

Posted by: Chris at December 24, 2003 8:58 AM

Brilliant!

Posted by: Mike Morley at December 24, 2003 9:55 AM

Bravo!

Posted by: Robert D at December 24, 2003 10:51 AM

As anyone who's read all 1300 book reviews would know, Clement Moore was not the author:

http://www.brothersjudd.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/reviews.detail/book_id/61/

Posted by: oj at December 24, 2003 10:59 AM

As anyone who followed the link in the title would know, I'm aware of the controversy.

Posted by: David Cohen at December 24, 2003 11:56 AM

*Very* nicely done!
Kalamazoo?! I used to live there too...

Posted by: Bruce Cleaver at December 24, 2003 12:49 PM

Thank you, David. Brilliant.

Posted by: Peter B at December 24, 2003 1:08 PM

Bravo, David. Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukkah, Happy New Year, .

Posted by: joe shropshire at December 24, 2005 12:15 PM

What fun. Two years later and the debate hasn't let up a bit. Great. Thanks to David for posting it and to ? who wrote it.

Posted by: erp at December 24, 2005 12:32 PM

Has any other poet ever been able to work "antidisestablishmentarianism" into their verse?

Perhaps only Ronald Knox or Chesterton.

Posted by: Jim in Chicago at December 25, 2005 1:30 PM

Jim: I am particularly proud of that. Not only does it scan, but it actually is used properly in context.

erp: That hurts. Now I know how Clement Moore feels.

Posted by: David Cohen at December 26, 2005 11:36 PM

It's still excellent, but I miss Harry Eager and some of the others that have fallen along the way. The debates used to be a bit more lively in those days.

Posted by: Patrick H at December 24, 2006 3:17 PM

Hard to believe just five years ago there were folks who still believed in Darwinism and that the Founding was secular.

Posted by: oj at December 24, 2006 11:55 PM

Amen, oj, and to think you've picked up some soccer nutters and Yankee fans, but it could be far far worse. God bless.

David: you should be proud.

Posted by: Jim in Chicago at December 25, 2006 12:41 AM
« FROM THE ARCHIVES: A SMALL, ROUGH, UNSIGHTLY BOX: | Main | »