December 5, 2006
THOSE STINKIN' LIMEYS TAKE ALL OUR BOOK-REVIEWING JOBS:
Whistling Past the Graveyard (John Derbyshire, Nov. 2006, New English Review)
[...] One of the strongest themes of America Alone is demographic. Practically all advanced Western countries have birthrates below “replacement levelâ€â€”their women, that is, having less than an average 2.1 children in their lifetimes. In some nations the birth rate is quite dramatically low: Russia and Italy at 1.2, Spain at 1.1. [...]Our only hope, therefore, says Steyn, is in the reform of Islam. Yet this is not ours to do. “Ultimately, only Muslims can reform Islam. All the free world can do is create conditions that increase the likelihood of Muslim reform, or at any rate do not actively impede it.†Steyn goes on to give a list of suggestions: Support women’s rights ... Support economic and political liberty ... Deny international legitimacy to really bad Muslim regimes ... Transform the energy industry (i.e. to reduce out dependency on oil) ... “Strike militarily when the opportunity presents itself.â€
After the pungent brilliance of the preceding 200 pages, this all falls a bit flat. And in fact, the reader who has traversed those 200 pages has been having different thoughts from the ones Steyn tries to guide him to. For example: Is that original list of options—submit to, destroy, or reform Islam—really exhaustive? How about we just fence it off : Expel our own Muslims, forbid Muslims to enter our countries, proscribe Islam, and deal with Muslim nations commercially at arm’s length? (They have to sell their oil to someone, or else starve.) Such actions are, of course, way over the line of politically acceptable discourse today; but in five or ten years, after a couple more jihadist atrocities, they will not be. [...]
And there are, of course, as must always be pointed out nowadays, the Great Unmentionables. Mark Steyn:
The refined antennae of Western liberals mean that whenever one raises the question of whether there will be any Italians living in the geographical zone marked as Italy a generation or three hence, they cry, “Racism!†To agitate about what proportion of the population is “white†is grotesque and inappropriate. It’s not about race; it’s about culture.Ah, culture. Of course it’s not about race! Nothing is about race, because there is no such thing as race. (Repeat 100 times.) It’s about culture—the aether, the phlogiston, of current social-anthropological speculation, whose actual nature is mysterious, but whose explanatory power is infinite. You know, culture: those habits, folkways, beliefs, ways of thinking and behaving and connecting that arise from... pure chance! Or geography (see below). Or something... but definitely nothing to do with biology.
Please don’t get me wrong. I am sure Mark Steyn is sincere here. I am sure he believes this stuff about “culture.†Most educated people do. Most will continue to do so for a few more years, while the neuroscientists, geneticists, genomicists, anthropologists, paleontologists, and statistical sociologists sap away beneath them—until the ground gives way.
It's worthwhile to note that Mark Steyn is writing about behavior, and in this excerpt does not even give an opinion as to how culture originates. Mr. Derbyshire proceeds to pound the table about a point Mr. Steyn never even made. If Mr. Steyn's primary concern is behavior, and thus culture, what precisely is Mr. Derbyshire's?
I guess Derb's point is "building fences." Which seems to be all the rage with people these days.
Hopefully we can build one high enough to stop missiles.
Derb would be at home in that new German party you posted on recently.
Posted by: Bruno at December 5, 2006 4:00 PMDerb would be at home in the more famous German party of the 30s & 40s.
Posted by: Bob at December 5, 2006 4:37 PMThe pertinent question is why America and Islam, which have futures, shouldn't fence off the secular Darwinist Europeans like Derbyshire, who don't.
Posted by: oj at December 5, 2006 4:56 PMSour grapes maybe.
Posted by: erp at December 5, 2006 5:16 PMThink for a moment about just how easy it is to torpedo Derbyshire's argument. You often hear about how the children of immigrants conform to American culture, but let's run a reverse play: Take a typical American kid at age two and plunk him down with the Palestinians, and all the unfortunate social disorders that tend to accompany them (my apologies in advance to the enlightened Palestinians out there, but the general tenor of things seems awfully disordered to me).
Come back in 20 years and observe the results. Is he more like the all-cultures-are-equal types at our trendy colleges, or does he bear animosity towards, uh, certain ethnic groups? Does he fancy a career in agriculture or investment banking? Is he a real hit with the ladies or a real bomb with the ladies, etc.?
Posted by: Matt Murphy at December 5, 2006 6:57 PMNRO slaps Derbyshire around when he goes off on race too much. The guy's an embarrassment to them. They want to pretend they're nobly interested in the immigration laws, not just biased against blacks and Hispanics.
So Derbyshire's found another site, which lets him rant unchecked.
Posted by: Casey Abell at December 6, 2006 12:20 PMCasey Abell:
Just occurred to me you might be talking about the NER site: I've noticed Mr. Derbyshire writing stuff there recently.
Posted by: Matt Murphy at December 7, 2006 7:00 PM