December 25, 2006

THE CONTEMPT OF THE CHATTERING CLASS (vis Tom Morin):

Do Iraqis Have Free Will?: Not according to liberals. (Theodore Dalrymple, 18 December 2006, City Journal)

A headline in the British liberal newspaper, the Guardian, caught my eye recently: IRAQIS CAN’T BE BLAMED FOR THE CHAOS UNLEASHED BY INVASION. The writer was that newspaper’s veteran foreign correspondent, Jonathan Steele (another immortal headline to one of his articles, in May 2002, read: NEW YORK IS STARTING TO FEEL LIKE BREZHNEV’S MOSCOW).

Let us grant, for argument’s sake, the article’s premise: that American policy in Iraq has been naive, rash, foolish, precipitate, and culpable. Yet still it would not follow that “Iraqis can’t be blamed” and so forth, unless one also believed what not even the severest critics of the Bush administration have alleged—that the American army, or other agents of the American government, have desired, planned, and even executed the ongoing terrorist attacks in Baghdad.

The only other explanation of the non-culpability of Iraqis would be that they were not really full members of the human race—in other words, that they did not reflect upon their circumstances and act upon their reflections in the way that the fully responsible and therefore potentially culpable Americans do.

The headline makes clear that double standards are about to apply, double standards that are not flattering to the Iraqis’ capacity for independent action, despite the evident wish of the author to display as conspicuously as possible his sympathy with them by means of exculpating them. Forgive them, he invites all men of goodwill, for they know not what they do.

Like hell, they don’t.

Not even the most ardent, anthropomorphic dog-lover credits his pet with a fully developed moral sense, and he therefore regards its misdemeanors with an indulgence that he would not extend to a ten-year-old child. The author regards Iraqis as if they were in the same moral category as pets: for can one really say that people who travel to a different part of the city to explode bombs, resulting in scores of deaths of people chosen merely because they are (most of them) of a different religious confession, do not appreciate what they are doing, any more than a dog appreciates what it does when it knocks over a precious porcelain vase?


The need to feel oneself in control of events is the signal characteristic of the Left--little wonder they think that their (our) actions control the wogs.


MORE:
When It Became Their Fault (Joseph Grosso, 26 December, 2006, Countercurrents.org

One of the more vulgar turns discourse over Iraq has taken over the past year is the bi-partisan, self-righteous way the bloody debacle is blamed almost entirely on the Iraqi people.

Speak of the devils.

Posted by Orrin Judd at December 25, 2006 11:57 AM
Comments

Comment for previous post doesn't work.

Posted by: erp at December 25, 2006 2:42 PM

In defense of man's best friend, it's not a fair comparison. A dog might break a priceless vase in an excess of exuberance, never deliberately.

Liberals ... they think that their (our) actions control the wogs. That would be child's play for lunatics who also think they can control the sun, the moon and the rotation of the earth by limiting aerosal sprays and barbeques.

Posted by: erp at December 26, 2006 9:41 AM

The need to feel oneself in control of events is the signal characteristic of the Left

It's also quite similar to a characteristic of conspiracy theories, (that all events are under the control of someone), which is why the Left is filling the void that the lack of a program has made with such fantasies.

(A lot of the comments are broken. Too much rum in the egg nog is my guess.)

Posted by: Raoul Ortega at December 26, 2006 11:08 AM
« IT'S JUST THERE FOR THE PARENTS: | Main | BOGGED DOWN IN MINUTIAE: »