November 26, 2006

WHY SHOULD ANY NON-DEMOCRATIC REGIME BE ADMITTED?:

Kick him out: UN must expel Ahmadinejad's murderous regime, says one of the world's leading moral voices (ELIE WIESEL, 11/25/06, NY Daiy News)

[E]ven in the domain of evil, differences and degrees exist. Certain dictators are worse than others, and their hateful actions have consequences more dangerous.

For the reader who has not yet guessed, I am speaking of the current president of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: More than so many others who abuse their position if not their power, this one represents the darkest of political action. [...]

This is why I maintain that such a figure does not have a place within the community of international leaders. Persona non grata, an undesirable individual, this is what he should become, because of what he is doing to his country, to his people, to all of humanity. This is why he deserves to be turned away everywhere. I'll go even further: The country he leads and embodies should be excluded from the United Nations as long as he is its ruler and symbol. On what grounds? It is quite simple: One member state of the United Nations that threatens to destroy another member state of these same United Nations violates its very charter and conventions.

Is something like this possible? I am not naive enough to believe that this could really happen. What state would introduce such a UN resolution? And how many delegates would vote to adopt it? I know all too well: very few. But at least they won't feel so comfortable in their fear. At least they'll learn from lessons of the not-so-distant past: We know with whom a dictator will begin; but he will not stop there. If Iran were to have a nuclear weapon, do we really think that Israel would remain its only target?

Some will say: What about North Korea? Why aren't we doing something about them? Don't they have the same atomic ambitions? Yes, they do. But there is still quite a difference. North Korea has never threatened to wipe away another state.


Well, other than South Korea and the U.S.. He's half right anyway--both should be excluded.

Posted by Orrin Judd at November 26, 2006 10:31 AM
Comments

Atually, Weisel has it all wrong.

In the not too distant future, for a country to maintain its standing in the UN, it'll be compulsory to join Iran's call for Israel's destruction.

(Or at least remain mum on the issue.)

Posted by: Barry Meislin at November 27, 2006 5:41 AM
« WHEN YOU'VE AGREED, WHY HAGGLE?: | Main | THE THIRD WAY IS STILL ONLY ABOUT A THIRD OF THE WAY HERE: »