November 27, 2006

WE'RE WITH MOOKIE:

Crush the Sunnis (James Kurth, 11.25.06, New Republic)

Before it leaves Iraq...the United States must inflict a dramatic and decisive defeat upon the Sunni insurgents--one that will demonstrate the unbearable cost and utter futility of the Islamist dream of establishing a Muslim umma under the rule of a global Sunni caliphate. That defeat must be more than military; it must also be political: The United States should divide Iraq into two parts, leaving the Kurds in control of the north, the Shia in control of the south--and the Sunnis stateless in between.

The Sunni Arabs of Iraq have much to answer for. Since they have always made up a rather small minority--about 15 to 20 percent of the country's total population--the regimes they created were historically authoritarian ones. They compensated for their small base by employing especially brutal methods against their Kurdish and Shia neighbors. Successive Sunni governments became steadily more repressive, leading eventually to the rule of the Baath Party and culminating in the ferocious regime of Saddam Hussein.

Baathist Iraq was often compared to Nazi Germany: Saddam was said to play the role of Adolf Hitler and the Baath Party that of the Nazi Party. A more accurate comparison, however, would analogize the Baath Party to the Waffen S.S., the Nazi Party's elite unit, and the Sunni Arab community to the Nazi Party as a whole, which eventually made up as much as 15 percent of Germany's population.

But, unlike their Nazi counterparts in Germany in 1945, the Sunni Arabs in Iraq in 2003 were not totally defeated, devastated, and demoralized by the time their government was toppled. Consequently, they were soon able to initiate and support a vicious insurgency.


At the confluence of demographics and political theory the end is self-evident: the Sunni have to submit to Shi'a rule or leave.

Posted by Orrin Judd at November 27, 2006 12:25 PM
Comments

They have a 3rd option: to die. And the End Game will have them dying in larger numbers than heretofore. I concede they have not been nearly as smart as I once thought.

Posted by: ghostcat at November 27, 2006 2:19 PM

Also ...

I am amazed by the number of "observers" who have apparently never understood that anything close to representative government in (say) Iraq means (by definition) Shia ascendency. Hey, Seuss!

Posted by: ghostcat at November 27, 2006 2:27 PM

Yes. Aside from the justice in retribution for their long complicity in the Baath regime, the supression of the Sunnis bodes well for the reformation of the spiritual jailhouse. More confusion to the enemy, don't you know.

We may compare the Baath party not to the Waffen SS, which was purely military, but to the entire SS, which included the Allgemeine or civilian SS, being bureaucracies paralleling or permeating the formal organs of government.

None of this should come as a surprise, as the original Iraqi Baath party was founded by one Rashid Ali, a Quisling-type character who tried to set up a pro-Nazi regime during WWII, before being ousted by the British, finishing the war in Germany as a consultant to the holocaust.

Posted by: Lou Gots at November 27, 2006 7:34 PM

Or just compare them to the Loyalists, many of whom had to, or chose to, flee back to Britain after the Revolution succeeded.

Posted by: oj at November 27, 2006 7:39 PM

So is The New Republic ready to endorse the overthrow of Ba'athism in Syria? Whole hog, as it were?

Posted by: jim hamlen at November 27, 2006 10:25 PM
« VICTORIA IS DEAD: | Main | PRAY FOR RAIN: »