November 24, 2006
THE ONLY GUY WHO MATTERS ISN'T A REALIST:
Nothing but woes for Baker group (TIMOTHY M. PHELPS, 11/22/06, Newsday)
Internal strife within the Baker commission, outright opposition from President George W. Bush and Tuesday's assassination of a cabinet member in Lebanon are complicating the prospect of U.S. overtures to Syria and Iran over Iraq, informed sources say.A source who spoke recently to a leader of the Iraq Study Group said he complained bitterly about internal dissension and partisanship among members of the supposedly bipartisan group, and was worried about reaching consensus on the key issues. [...]
[L]ast week the president strongly endorsed his administration's past tough line with both countries. On Iran he said: "Our focus of this administration is to convince the Iranians to give up its nuclear weapons ambitions ... And so we have made it very clear, our position regards Iran, and it hasn't changed."
Accusations that Syria was behind Tuesday's assassination of Lebanese Christian cabinet minister Pierre Gemayel are expected to make an opening to Syria more difficult.
Phebe Marr, an Iraq expert who advised the Baker group, said that while she favors approaching Iran and Syria for help, the United States would have to make concessions to each country. "There is a price for that, and it is not clear to me the Bush administration is willing to pay it," she said.
Iran and Syria have interests in a stable Iraq lest they be destabilized themselves. We don't until they have been. Posted by Orrin Judd at November 24, 2006 11:55 AM
Confusion to the enemy--something to be thankful for.
Posted by: Lou Gots at November 24, 2006 12:12 PMFine, as long as we can rely on George. But how exactly does an unstable Iraq destabilize Iran or Syria? Haven´t they been stirring the pot there? We are the ones talking about "approaching Iran and Syria for help" which is madness in my opinion.
We should have our drones patrolling Syrian-Iraqi and Iranian-Iraqi borders, and smash whoever tried to cross the borders not using manned border-crossings. That will cut off foreign fighters, then let the Iraqis fight it out among themselves or negotiate peace when they are tired of dying.
Posted by: ic at November 24, 2006 2:11 PMNo one's crossing, that's just an excuse.
Posted by: oj at November 24, 2006 8:23 PMSunni refugees fleeing West and a liberal Shi'a state to Iran's West.
Posted by: oj at November 24, 2006 8:24 PMIf Assad is still breathing on Jan. 21, 2009, then we will know that 43 really has emulated his father. Because whoever 44 is, there will be a lot of heavy lifting needed.
Posted by: jim hamlen at November 24, 2006 11:44 PMIf Assad is still breathing on Jan. 21, 2009, we will know that 43 has emulated his father in the worst possible way.
Posted by: ratbert at November 25, 2006 12:00 AMNapoleon warned against "forming a picture".
Refugees going west will enter Jordan, not Syria. If they enter Syria, it is unclear how they would destabilise the regime. As for that liberal shi'a state, I hope you are right, but I would not bet on it.
Posted by: wf at November 25, 2006 3:27 PM