November 6, 2006

THE DISCREET CHARM OF THE SECULAR EUGENICIST

Obstetricians call for debate on ethics of euthanasia for very sick babies (Sarah Boseley, The Guardian, November 6th, 2006)

Doctors involved in childbirth are calling for an open discussion about the ethics of euthanasia for the sickest of newborn babies. The option to end the suffering of a severely damaged newborn baby - who might have been aborted if the parents had known earlier the extent of its disabilities and potential suffering - should be discussed, says the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists in its evidence to an inquiry by the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, which examines ethical issues raised by new developments.

The college says the Nuffield's working group should "think more radically about non-resuscitation, withdrawal of treatment decisions, the best-interests test and active euthanasia as they are means of widening the management options available to the sickest of newborns".

The inquiry is looking into "the ethics of prolonging life in foetuses and the newborn". Euthanasia was not originally on the agenda, because of its illegality. But the RCOG submission has persuaded the inquiry to broaden its investigation, although any recommendation favouring euthanasia for newborns is highly unlikely before a change in the law.

The college ethics committee tells the inquiry it feels euthanasia "has to be covered and debated for completion and consistency's sake ... if life-shortening and deliberate interventions to kill infants were available, they might have an impact on obstetric decision making, even preventing some late abortions, as some parents would be more confident about continuing a pregnancy and taking a risk on outcome." It points out that a pregnant woman who discovers at 28 weeks that her baby has a serious abnormality can have an abortion. Parents of a baby born at 24 weeks with the same abnormality have no such option.

Wow, we knew the death lobby was creative, but this is the first time we’ve heard the argument that infanticide could be a good way to bring down the abortion rate.

Posted by Peter Burnet at November 6, 2006 6:18 AM
Comments

I think we all know where this leads. There will be court cases of distraught parents trying to prevent a hospital from "humanely euthenizing" their babies. And the hospitals will have the law on their side.

Posted by: RC at November 6, 2006 10:38 AM

If there such a court case (parents trying to prevent a hospital from "humanely euthenizing" their babies), I'm sure lefists will blame it on capitalism.

Posted by: Joseph Hertzlinger at November 6, 2006 1:08 PM

Heck, good capitalists would sell baby parts and put the money away toward their retirement.

Posted by: erp at November 6, 2006 5:40 PM
« THE DANGER OF GENIUS: | Main | MORALLY UNSERIOUS: »