October 22, 2006

THE ISMS CAN'T WITHSTAND THE FACTS:

Ugly, Thorny Things (Joseph Epstein, wall Street Journal)

I get most of my notions about the world and how it works less from experience than from books. Almost all my interesting discoveries, my Eureka moments, have been found in other writers' pages. I've been reading "The Letters of George Santayana," for instance, and, in a letter from his student days in Germany, Santayana notes the complete incapacity of the Germans for boredom. Bouncing the bottom of my palm off my forehead, I exclaim, "Of course." Suddenly I understand the ability of the Germans to spend 14 or more hours listening to Wagner's Ring Cycle, or thrill to Goethe's "Faust."

I had another such moment while reading James Buchan's "Crowded with Genius," a book about the 18th-century Scottish Enlightenment. The moment came with these two sentences: "The 18th century had more ideas about the past than it had facts: archeology and philology were infant sciences. (The 21st century has more facts than ideas.)" Eureka! The relation between facts and ideas appeared to me in an entirely new light.

Not only have the past 50 or so years been largely bereft of grand ideas, but much of the best intellectual work of the period has been devoted to eliminating the major ideas, or idea systems, of the previous 100 or so years: notably, Marxism and Freudianism, with Darwinism perhaps next to tumble. The lesson seems to be that the accretion of new facts tends to undo ideas.

Posted by Orrin Judd at October 22, 2006 12:00 AM
Comments

"The lesson seems to be that the accretion of new facts tends to undo ideas."

Perhaps, but the larger lesson is that most new ideas are worse than the current ones, as Will and Ariel Durant point out in "The Lessons of History":

"Out of every hundred new ideas ninety-nine or more will probably be inferior to the tradional responses which they propose to replace. ... It is good that new ideas should be heard, for the sake of the few that can be used; but it is also good that new ideas should be compelled to go through the mill of objection, opposition, and contumely; this is the trial heat which innovations must survive before being allowed to enter the human race."

Posted by: jd watson at October 22, 2006 7:37 PM

should, not must

Posted by: oj at October 22, 2006 7:58 PM
« JUBAL'S HARPER: | Main | DON'T HAVE TO VOTE LIKE MASSA TELLS YOU TO: »