October 6, 2006
BUT THEN WE RELIEVED THEM OF JERUSALEM AFTER ALL:
Crusades shouldn't be so painful a topic: Down through history, it's the losers who harbor grudges. Muslims got over the Middle Ages conflict the easiest way: by winning (David M. Perry, 10/01/06, Minneapolis Tribune)
From 1095 to 1291, medieval western Christians carved out small kingdoms along the eastern Mediterranean shore. They were weak, constantly endangered and eventually doomed. Once they were gone, the Muslim world focused on the expanding Islamic states in Egypt, Persia, the Ottoman Empire and later India. The Ottomans, in particular, kept right on winning against the Christian West, twice reaching the walls of Vienna with massive armies. They did not forget their history, but the Crusades receded to the status of a brief blot on the record of Muslim expansion, a blot that had created both heroes and villains, but not anything to get worked up about.It's the Christian Europeans, the losers, who preserved the memory and emotions of the Crusades. For hundreds of years afterwards, they constantly invoked the Crusades, not only when fighting "infidels" (Muslims, Protestants and heretics, not to mention political rivals), but also while exploring and colonizing America, Africa and Asia.
Christopher Columbus, for example, promised to dedicate a healthy percentage of his profits toward the "liberation" of Jerusalem. In the 19th century, Emperor Louis Napoleon and Kaiser Wilhelm I compared their nation's colonial endeavors to the deeds of medieval figures such as Richard the Lion-Hearted, Philip Augustus and even Saladin. In 1898 the kaiser, dressed in a costume that he imagined medieval, had a hole knocked in the walls of Jerusalem so he could enter in just the same spot as a German medieval emperor, Frederick II, did more than 600 years previously.
The reemergence of the language of "anti-Crusade" in the Muslim world appears only during the modern era. It is a postcolonial phenomenon now being accelerated by a new breed of jihadists who believe they are fighting a holy war.
It reappears after we won the Crusade. Posted by Orrin Judd at October 6, 2006 9:46 PM
By "post-colonial phenomenon" the writer appears to mean Boxerist neurosis. Unequipped either to compete or to adapt, the Boxer lashes out in insane violence. We saw this in our own history, through all the the mad, hopeless Indian "insurgencies."
The jailhouse has failed. It has been surpassed. It is going under, to use Spengler's, the real Spengler's, word. It is fitting that the suicide bomber is its weapon of last desperate resort, for that is the expression of abject failure. Unreformed Shinto lashed out that way, just before our hand closed on its throat.
Posted by: Lou Gots at October 6, 2006 11:28 PMThe West did not win the crusade. It survived the crusade, and evolved pass religious wars. The crusade was medieval after all, only those who are frozen in their medieval mentalities don't realize that, the rest of the world have grown up and moved on. Of course the West dreamed up other ideologies, and killed millions on account of them. Some losers with low abilities but outsized egos always want to kill and control other people. These losers, such as Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and OBL, can't thrive in peace because they are inadequate. What do inadequate people who have outsized ego do? They lash out against the world who "wronged" them. The only recourse the West has is to cut them down.
Posted by: ic at October 7, 2006 12:34 AMWho decides who gets Jerusalem? We do. We won.
Posted by: oj at October 7, 2006 10:58 AMWe put the Indians in camps. Islam is taking over Europe.
Posted by: oj at October 7, 2006 11:00 AM"Islam is taking over Europe."
This is exactly why the plan must be to simultaneously sow chaos and provoke explosion. Let thrm dance the Ghost Dance and charge the Maxims. The window for reformation may not remain open forever.
Now this is very much what is happening over there at this moment. The pity is that for it to work it must appear unplanned.
We do this as much for their benefit as for our our.
Posted by: Lou Gots at October 7, 2006 12:24 PM--Who decides who gets Jerusalem? We do. We won.--
Only if it's declared an International City.
Posted by: Sandy P at October 7, 2006 12:47 PMIt's declared whatever we decide to declare it.
Posted by: oj at October 7, 2006 6:17 PM