September 26, 2006

WHICH IS WHY THE LONG WAR IS UNLOSEABLE:

Musharraf 'war-gamed' U.S., concluded Pakistan would lose (PAUL KORING, 9/26/06, Globe and Mail)

Pakistan's military ruler, Pervez Musharraf, says he contemplated war with the United States in 2001 but opted instead to forsake the Taliban and become President George W. Bush's ally.

"I war-gamed the United States as an adversary," the Pakistani leader wrote in his martially titled memoirs In the Line of Fire, published yesterday. It apparently didn't take the general, then an international pariah for having staged a coup to toppled his country's democratic government, very long to conclude that Pakistan would lose.

"The answer was a resounding no," he wrote, having concluded that the world's most powerful military would wipe out his forces, destroy his nuclear weapons, wreak havoc on Pakistan's threadbare infrastructure, help India seize disputed Kashmir and then turn to his archrival in New Delhi for the support and bases it needed to topple Afghanistan's Taliban regime.


The beauty of being the hyperpower is that we retain that option vis-a-vis every other nation on Earth.

Posted by Orrin Judd at September 26, 2006 11:23 AM
Comments

No doubt that war game took about as long as a round of rock-paper-scissors where he realized he had had very small scissors and we had a very large rock.

Posted by: Rick T at September 26, 2006 12:01 PM

An option is only as good as the willingness to use it. Absent 9/11, we'd be just that much farther along to becoming a Euro-style welfare state.

100s of smart people have forseen the issue. No one can beat us, but we can beat ourselves.

Posted by: Bruno at September 26, 2006 12:35 PM

I think that the most important reason we haven't seen a repeat of 9/11 is because Islamic fundamentalists know that would move a bunch more of us to the right.

Posted by: erp at September 26, 2006 1:12 PM

erp:

You are affording too much acumen to islamofascists. They don't care if we move right or left, their only concern is killing all of us regardless of our political ideology. The reason we haven't seen another 9/11, or worse, is because they haven't been able to mount another operation.

Posted by: sam at September 26, 2006 1:26 PM

Bruno:

That's backwards. 9-11 has only slowed the Third Way Reformation, providing an artificial rallying point for the reactionary Left.

We can't beat ourselves because demographics are making us more like ourselves than we've been since the 20s.

Posted by: oj at September 26, 2006 1:41 PM

I think Islamic fundamentalist leaders are a bit savvier than the crazies we see on TV shaking their fists and shooting their machine guns in the air. They were surprised by our reaction to 9/11 and don't want to test it again.

I do, however, also give full credit to Bushco for our super efforts against terrorism both here and abroad

o/t It's no end of amusing. Our president did it again by rejecting the Dem leadership's request for a closed door session. The facts will fall where they may. I really hope they don't get smarter and stop falling for the same banana peel trick every time.

Posted by: erp at September 26, 2006 2:16 PM

Pervez Musharraf is a fool. He will either quit or be overthrown soon after he returned to Pakistan. He makes a few bucks with his book, but he sounds so weak back home, keeling over to the great Satan's threat. It might have been the logical thing to do in a logical world. But the Muslim crazies are not logical. They don't care about or even understand strategic concerns. They submitted to Musharraf's rule because he was perceived to be strong. Now they know better. I bet M will declare his desire to retire by the end of the year.

Posted by: ic at September 26, 2006 2:32 PM

"They were surprised by our reaction to 9/11 and don't want to test it again"

erp - read this and I think you will have a different view on the matter. Test it again is exactly what they do want.

http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/site/modules/news/article.php?storyid=589

Posted by: BJW at September 26, 2006 2:49 PM

Libya saw the light too.

Posted by: TGN at September 26, 2006 3:03 PM

No, they submit because they're even weaker.

Posted by: oj at September 26, 2006 4:59 PM

BJW - It sounds like braggadocio to me.

Posted by: erp at September 26, 2006 5:00 PM

We'll be tested in '09-10. It's coming.

Posted by: Sandy P at September 26, 2006 6:31 PM

Barely a quiz.

Posted by: oj at September 26, 2006 6:37 PM

Does anyone else remember the Musharref TV appearance he made to announce his acceptance or our point of view? I vividly recall both that he said that protecting one man, meaning OBL, was not worth millions if deaths.

More than the words, I remember how scared the man looked--really, really scared.

Superior terror smashed terrorism, as it ever shall.

As to Pakistan gaming out a war with the United State, the above comments are most valid. The game would make Omdurman look like an even match.

Posted by: Lou Gots at September 26, 2006 8:09 PM
« THE ONE BENEFIT OF PARLIAMENTARY GOVERNMENT: | Main | IRAQ MATTERS TO EXACTLY THE EXTENT IT CAN PUMP ENOUGH OIL TO LOWER PRICES: »