September 27, 2006

RIGHT IN ROBERTS'S WHEELHOUSE:

Court to hear case over politics, union fees (Chris Borowski, 9/27/06, Medill News Service)

The Supreme Court agreed Tuesday to hear a Washington state case that will decide whether labor unions can spend bargaining fees from nonmembers on political causes without their explicit permission. [...]

The so-called paycheck-protection law, ruled unconstitutional by the state court, was passed by 73 percent of Washington's voters in a 1992 initiative. [...]

Opponents of the union said they were pleased the U.S. Supreme Court would take on the case.

"This is a good indication of how the Supreme Court will likely rule," said Mike Reitz of the Evergreen Freedom Foundation, a think tank that played a key role in pushing the case against WEA. "No one should be forced to pay for political causes they do not support."

A ruling against the WEA would have wider negative repercussions for labor organizations by weakening their ability to fund political activities, said Professor Daniel Jacoby, chair of the Harry Bridges Center for Labor Studies at the University of Washington.

The Supreme Court is expected to hear the case in January.


Nice use of "so-called," eh?

Posted by Orrin Judd at September 27, 2006 12:00 AM
Comments

That just the way we should be writing, "so-called progressives."

Posted by: Lou Gots at September 27, 2006 11:00 AM

IIRC, the WEA instituted another fee to make sure they didn't lose revenue.

It only took 15 years to get to the Supremes.

Posted by: Sandy P at September 27, 2006 11:53 AM

Whatever happened to (with) the Beck decision?

Posted by: jim hamlen at September 28, 2006 12:05 AM
« HAVE YOU THANKED THE GANG TODAY? (via Kevin Whited): | Main | YELLOWCAKE CHRONICLES CONTINUED: »