September 3, 2006

...AND ANGLOER...:

India may finally embrace capitalism (CHRISTOPHER LINGLE, 9/04/06, The Japan Times)

[Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's] coalition government depends on the support of Neanderthal socialists and unwashed communists. Despite these problems, progress is being made. Singh recently pointed to improved economic conditions as evidence that India should move toward complete capital-account convertibility.

While current-account transactions involving trade in goods and services are open, Indian citizens and companies face sharp restrictions on borrowing or investing overseas. It also means that households do not have the ability to seek higher returns on their savings by placing them overseas. As such, Indians pay a heavy high price for controls that distort investment decisions and lead to the misallocation of capital.

It remains uncertain how quickly New Delhi will move on this change. It turns out that a plan was tabled in June 1997 that would have made the rupee fully convertible for capital accounts within three years. But the devaluation of the Thai baht the following month marked the beginning of widespread turmoil on Asian currency markets and led to the plan being shelved.

This time the plan might move forward since there is a growing consensus of the need for capital inflows to keep India's economy powering ahead. Estimates are that India must attract foreign direct investment (FDI) of around $ 70 billion over the next five years to lift economic growth to an annual target rate above 9 percent.

Presently India's currency is convertible only for trade or current accounts whereby companies or individuals exchange rupees for foreign currencies to trade in goods and services. The Reserve Bank of India regulates the exchange of rupees for other currencies for investment purposes, deciding on the circumstances under which it can be done.

These rules also restrict currency conversion for foreign entities that wish to invest in India and Indians who would invest abroad. And Indian companies face an annual limit of $ 500 million on foreign borrowing.

Ending India's capital restrictions is plausible given a relatively low fiscal deficit, tame price inflation and a manageable proportion of nonperforming assets at domestic banks. With foreign-exchange reserves exceeding $ 140 billion and GDP growth of almost 8 percent a year, India's economic conditions are stable enough to cope with sudden capital outflows.

With per capita GDP of $ 580 and a current account surplus of $ 9 billion, India's economy has a relatively small footprint on global markets. The potential for growth as an exporter and magnet for FDI is evident in that domestic demand accounts for 87 percent of GDP, much higher than in most trading countries.

Allowing more international outflows of capital could increase foreign investment inflows and help end the lingering distortions introduced by Nehru's socialist planners.

Posted by Orrin Judd at September 3, 2006 8:43 PM
Comments

Until India shakes off its latent socialism it will never compete with China.

Posted by: Gideon at September 3, 2006 9:33 PM

Those poor folks got sucked into socialism via Boxerism, i.e. hatred of the West.

Posted by: Lou Gots at September 3, 2006 10:52 PM

Time to make a sequel to "Gandhi." Few people in the U.S. have any idea of what happened in the aftermath of the saintly Bapu's peaceful liberation of India from the yoke of the brutal British Raj.

Posted by: erp at September 4, 2006 9:17 AM
« YOU FIGHT POSTMODERNISM WITH PRE-MODERNISM | Main | SELLING BUTTER WHEN THEY WANT GUNS: »