August 19, 2006

THE GRASS IS ALWAYS GREENER ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE LITANI

What the war is about (Saul Singer, Jerusalem Post, August 17th, 2006)

It is hard to find anyone in Israel who says we won this war besides the prime minister and those around him. The same goes for Israel's friends abroad, who almost uniformly term it a resounding defeat. But I found someone who disagrees - in Lebanon:

"Hizbullah at best won a tactical victory in standing its ground. However, its rocket deterrent has effectively been neutralized for years, because Shi'ite civilians cannot soon be put through such trauma again.

"Hizbullah's skills were on display in a fight that was largely meaningless, and you can be assured that next time the Israelis will come better prepared; the vague Lebanese consensus behind the party, never very strong anyway, has been shattered, so that Hizbullah cannot be as adventurist in the future as it was in the past. Arab hostility to Hizbullah has escalated, and was on display during the recent diplomacy; and for the foreseeable future Hizbullah will have to behave more like the Salvation Army than a 'resistance' because of the hundreds of thousands of Shi'ites it must take care of.

"For all these reasons and more, I don't see this as a victory for Hizbullah, and I'm not even mentioning the billions of dollars of losses Lebanon must face. In its calculations, strangely, Hizbullah never seemed to factor in the losses outside the Shi'ite community."

Never in the field of human conflict has so much conflicting, confusing analysis been thrown at so many by so few. Anyone reading the strategic wisdom of pundits far and wide over the past week could be forgiven for feeling as if he is in a dream where all the world’s sportswriters are arguing bitterly about which team won a baseball game that was called for rain in the third inning. In an Israel that has just devastated south Lebanon and badly bruised the enemy, rage against the political and strategic blunders of this “defeat” is being thrown around willy-nilly in the most apocalyptic of language, which is bizarre to anyone who remembers 1973. Surely, though, we are now familiar enough with Arab psychology to know that the mass crowing over Hezbollah’s “victory” and the mindless hero-worship of Nasrallah are pretty good clues that they know full well they didn’t win.

Posted by Peter Burnet at August 19, 2006 9:00 AM
Comments

Never in the field of bloggery has so much confusing analysis been thrown at the question of what war the most confusing analysis has been thrown at.

But I digress. As with the GWOT, pundits are trying to secure their place in journalistic history to be the first to call the decisive moment in the war. It is like listening to some football commentator say that a blown play in the first quarter of the first game of the season will decide the whole season for team x. The problem with the analogy is that a football season has to end, whereas Israel's future doesn't have to. Their only goal is to survive. They don't have a "season" in which they have to score x number of decisive victories against their enemies. Every conflict that they survive allows them to exist and to "field a team" in the next conflict.

The Islamist goal is to wipe them out. They didn't do that, and they lost ground to boot. So there is no win.

The same is true in our fight against Islamofascism. They have to destroy us, we don't have to destroy them. Everyone is trying to call decisive moments. Unfortunately many of these people are supporters of the war. It would be great if we could prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, but we haven't lost if they do. We've only lost when we stop fighting and surrender.

Posted by: Robert Duquette at August 19, 2006 9:28 AM

The spread on the war apparently was Israel by 14 1/2 points, and they failed to cover. That's what seems to have so many in the punditocracy upset.

Posted by: John at August 19, 2006 9:49 AM

Patience.

Posted by: ghostcat at August 19, 2006 6:43 PM

Thanks to John for coming up with a metaphor for what I think happened. Israel wins on the ground, but not enough to meet its goals, for now. Of course having the UN and France go out of the way to act in ways that justify Israel's actions does set the Israelis up well for round too.

Posted by: Drew at August 20, 2006 10:44 AM
« CHAIRMAN LIEBERMAN: | Main | YES, BUT CAN THE CIA PROVE HE'S AN ANTI-ZIONIST/ANTI-AMERICAN NUKE NUT?: »