August 27, 2006

THE ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY LEARNS HOW TO COUNT

Gays must change, says archbishop (Jonathan Wynne-Jones, The Telegraph, August 27th, 2006)

The archbishop of Canterbury has told homosexuals that they need to change their behaviour if they are to be welcomed into the church, The Sunday Telegraph can reveal. Rowan Williams has distanced himself from his one-time liberal support of gay relationships and stressed that the tradition and teaching of the Church has in no way been altered by the Anglican Communion's consecration of its first openly homosexual bishop.

The declaration by the archbishop - rebutting the idea that homosexuals should be included in the church unconditionally - marks a significant development in the church's crisis over homosexuals. According to liberal and homosexual campaigners, it confirmed their fears that the archbishop has become increasingly conservative - and sparked accusations that he has performed an "astonishing" U-turn over the homosexual issue.

Liberals who had previously hailed his appointment said they are dismayed that he appears to have turned his back on an agenda that he previously championed.

However, the archbishop's comments have received strong support from traditionalists. The Rev Rod Thomas, a spokesman for the evangelical pressure group Reform, said: "There is no doubt that he is distancing himself from the views that he has previously expressed. He's right to want to see people converted. The fact that he's saying this is a hugely welcome development."

Maybe he finally decided that the fun of marching on Gay Pride Day wasn’t worth tossing out the plinth of civilization after all.

Posted by Peter Burnet at August 27, 2006 8:15 AM
Comments

"rebutting the idea that homosexuals should be included in the church unconditionally" - an unfortunate choice of words.

Posted by: obc at August 27, 2006 8:33 AM

obc - yeah, I caught that too. Beavis (or is it Butthead?) would be snickering nonstop.

As for the rest of the article, there is this gem:

"At the same time he tried to distance himself from a controversial essay he wrote 20 years ago, in which he defended same-sex love. "That was when I was a professor, to stimulate debate," he claimed."

More likely, he actually believed what he was writing back then, and now with the benefit of empiricism, has seen it is disastrous. His pride simply prevents him from acknowledging that.

Posted by: Bruce Cleaver at August 27, 2006 9:42 AM

Yes, quite a legacy the chief druid would leave, splitting the Church of England.

It's for posterity and he blinked.

Posted by: Sandy P at August 27, 2006 1:29 PM
« AND THEN THERE'S THE ONE COUNTRY THAT ACTUALLY DOES STUFF: | Main | GETTING TO MONO ISN'T THAT EASY: »