July 7, 2006
WHY HAVE ANY PHYSICAL MONEY?:
Do Pennies Still Make Sense?: As Zinc Prices Rise, the Idea of Losing the Cent Gains Currency (Jeff Donn, 7/07/06, Associated Press)
A penny used to buy a loaf of bread, but in an age of inflation and affluence, the coin is slowly sliding into monetary obsolescence.Posted by Orrin Judd at July 7, 2006 9:59 AMFor the first time, the U.S. Mint has said this year that pennies are costing more than 1 cent to make, thanks to higher metal prices.
A penny really costs more than a penny to make? That is both hilarious and sad.
Posted by: Marisa at July 7, 2006 10:23 AMThe article says it costs 1.2 cents to produce a penny, but doesn't say what the useful life of one penny is...wouldn't that come into play somewhere in the equation?
Posted by: Gil Gilliam at July 7, 2006 11:21 AMAmongst the change I received at a store a few weeks ago was a penny minted in 1948. Most of the ones that accumulate around the house are from the "aughts" (or whatever we've decided to call this 1st decade of the new century/millenium).
Posted by: Dave W at July 7, 2006 11:58 AMA nickle costs 5.73 cents to make.
Posted by: Chris B at July 7, 2006 12:20 PMIf the value of the coins minted is LESS than the cost to produce, is it still called seigniorage?
Posted by: Rick T. at July 7, 2006 12:42 PMBut nothing costs more than it used to.
Posted by: joe shropshire at July 7, 2006 12:45 PMAh, seignorage. One of my favorite things.
The reason it is a big deal that the penny costs more than 1 cent to mint is that the government makes a lot of money from producing currency. A dollar bill, for example, costs a couple of cents to print, but is exchanged by the government for value equal to $1. A $100 bill costs the same to print as a $1 bill, but the government gets $100 in exchange. The difference between the cost of making the currency and the value of the currency is called seignorage.
Now, all the seignorage is not income to the government. Eventually, someone is going to come back and want $100 worth of value for that $100 bill. For that reason, seignorage is better looked at as a long-term (in effect, perpetual) loan to the government and the income is equal to the forgone interest the government would otherwise have to pay. Right now, there is about $740 billion in circulating currency and the yield on the 30 year Treasury is 5.16%. Right now, seignorage is worth about $38 billion this year.
Three caveats. First, seignorage is only limited to the imputed forgone interest is the currency is circulating. When currency is really collectors' bait, like the proof sets of the 50 state quarters, the entire value of the uncirculating coin is seignorage. The Treasury figures that it has made about $5 billion in seignorage on the state quarters.
Second, it is obvious that a fiat currency -- one that costs the government less to produce than its face value -- is inherently inflationary. Increasing the money supply (a) increases seignorate revenue and (b) causes inflation so that the amount "paid back" by the Treasury in the future is less than the amount received in seignorage. A vicious cycle, indeed.
Third, the trend towards electronic money (debit cards, etc.) reduces seignorage.
Posted by: David Cohen at July 7, 2006 12:47 PMPennies certainly don't. Everyplace you'd use one keeps a cup full of them by the register that you can get free.
Posted by: oj at July 7, 2006 12:48 PMEveryplace you'd use one keeps a cup full of them by the register that you can get free
You know, I'm so used to that it never even crosses my mind that it's a remarkable practice.
The streets may not be paved in gold in the good old USA, but we've got free pennies!!
Posted by: Twn at July 7, 2006 1:20 PMIf I ever open a retail business, I intend to round the register totals down to the nearest quarter. So I lose a dime here, 20¢ there...
Not having to deal with small change will be worth it, and I might even win a few regular customers with the practice.
Posted by: Noam Chomsky at July 7, 2006 1:57 PMNoam;
Rounding down to the nearest nickel is becoming common around my area. Some places round up, to, and customers don't care (if they do, presumably the cashier rounds down instead, but I have never seen a complaint so I can say for certain).
Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at July 7, 2006 2:32 PMAny place where the average sale is over $50 or so should just have a policy to ignore the numbers to the right of the decimal point. If your profit margin is that small that you can't do that, then you should be looking for another line of business or work. (The IRS lets you do this, too.)
Our friends Down Under (Australia and New Zealand) have been without any coin of lower value than five cents for about 15 years now. People seem to have adjusted all right.
Posted by: Random Lawyer at July 7, 2006 2:49 PMBought three cigars today for a total of $18.11 and got $2 back as change.
Posted by: David Cohen at July 7, 2006 2:56 PMOr the government colud just find a cheaper composite metal combination of zinc and copper (Americans in 1943 seemed to be OK with the steel pennies not having their normal copper look, and if there's some other metal or alloy that's below the one-cent production threshold, they can try that if the majority of folks want to retain the penny as a form or U.S. coinage).
Posted by: John at July 7, 2006 2:58 PM$18! David you Republican fatcat. (I trust you used the two dollar bills to light the things).
Posted by: Jim in Chicago at July 8, 2006 1:32 AM