June 23, 2006
THEY ALSO FOUND A TOILET WITH THE SEAT UP
Study reveals 'oldest jewellery' (Paul Rincon, BBC, June 22nd, 2006)
The earliest known pieces of jewellery made by modern humans have been identified by scientists.The three shell beads are between 90,000 and 100,000 years old, according to an international research team.
Two of the ancient beads come from Skhul Cave on the slopes of Mount Carmel in Israel. The other comes from the site of Oued Djebbana in Algeria. [...]
They represent a remarkable early expression of modern behaviour in the archaeological record, experts say.
"The interesting thing about necklaces and this kind of behaviour is that it is symbolic. When we wear items like this, we are sending a message," said co-author Professor Chris Stringer of London's Natural History Museum.
"The message may be that we are powerful, or wealthy, or sexy, that we're part of a particular group, or to ward off evil. They're not just decorative; we think they had a social meaning." [...]
Up until recently, examples of modern behaviour before 50,000 years ago had eluded researchers, even though humans with modern-looking anatomy are known in the fossil record from about 195,000 years ago onward.
This had led some researchers to propose that modern anatomy and modern behaviour did not evolve in tandem.
Instead, they argued, a fortuitous mutation in the human brain may have triggered an explosion in human creativity 50,000 years ago, leading to a sudden appearance of personal ornaments, skilfully-crafted art, novel tools and weapons.
The discovery of 75,000-year-old Nassarius shell beads at Blombos Cave in South Africa challenged this idea. These beads even bore traces of red ochre, used as a pigment. Now the dates for beads from Skhul and Oued Djebbana further weaken the "cultural explosion" scenario, says Stringer.
Professor Alison Brooks, an expert in African archaeology at George Washington University, US, said the study was "very well researched".
"I am not surprised because I have long thought that the wide variety of bead types that we see during the Upper Palaeolithic in Europe had to have an antecedent. And this tradition is a very logical antecedent," she told the BBC News website.
"It supports my thought that there are no great revolutions in the evolution of modern human behaviour - it is a gradual process."
At least it was before we invented gender sensitivity seminars and self-esteem workshops to shed all those irrational social constructs that keep holding us back and making us miserable.
Posted by Peter Burnet at June 23, 2006 9:14 AMI may be wrong but my theory is that after the Neolithic Revolution humans had more leisure time and therefore time to create (rather than merely survive).
Posted by: Bartman at June 23, 2006 10:37 AMOn what evidence to they make the assumption that ehse beads were merely decorative? Maybe they were part of a fishing lure, and not "oldest jewellery [sic]" but the latest (for the times) tools? Or maybe they had magical powers and so were religious artifacts?
What is it about the paleontologists, evolutionary biologists, archeologists and such types that they have to project their limited imaginations on everything they find?