June 13, 2006

IF KNOWLEDGE IS VERY, VERY OLD, IS IT NEW?

In a Ruined Copper Works, Evidence That Bolsters a Doubted Biblical Tale (John Noble Wilford, NY Times, 6/13/06)

In biblical lore, Edom was the implacable adversary and menacing neighbor of the Israelites. The Edomites lived south of the Dead Sea and east of the desolate rift valley known as Wadi Arabah, and from time to time they had to be dealt with by force, notably by the likes of Kings David and Solomon.

Today, the Edomites are again in the thick of combat — of the scholarly kind. The conflict is heated and protracted, as is often the case with issues related to the reliability of the Bible as history.

Chronology is at the crux of the debate. Exactly when did the nomadic tribes of Edom become an organized society with the might to threaten Israel? Were David and Solomon really kings of a state with growing power in the 10th century B.C.? Had writers of the Bible magnified the stature of the two societies at such an early time in history?

An international team of archaeologists has recorded radiocarbon dates that they say show the tribes of Edom may have indeed come together in a cohesive society as early as the 12th century B.C., certainly by the 10th. The evidence was found in the ruins of a large copper-processing center and fortress at Khirbat en-Nahas, in the lowlands of what was Edom and is now part of Jordan.

Thomas E. Levy, a leader of the excavations, said in an interview last week that the findings there and at abandoned mines elsewhere in the region demonstrated that the Edomites had developed a complex state much earlier than previously thought....

"We have discovered a degree of social complexity in the land of Edom," they wrote, "that demonstrates the weak reed on the basis of which a number of scholars have scoffed at the idea of a state or complex chiefdom in Edom at this early period."

The findings, Dr. Levy and Dr. Najjar added, lend credence to biblical accounts of the rivalry between Edom and the Israelites in what was then known as Judah. By extension, they said, this supported the tradition that Judah itself had by the time of David and Solomon, in the early 10th century, emerged as a kingdom with ambition and the means of fighting off the Edomites....

In the context, Dr. Levy and Dr. Najjar wrote, "the biblical references to the Edomites, especially their conflicts with David and subsequent Judahite kings, garner a new plausibility."

Any day now, we'll learn something our ancestors didn't know....

Posted by David Cohen at June 13, 2006 12:43 PM
Comments

It is very common for historians to doubt the authenticity of legends. By the 19th century no one believed Troy existed or Rome had kings. Then they found archaeological evidence that proved Troy did exist and that Rome did have kings at one point. This is no different.

It would be a mistake to take everything in the Bible as hard fact, or forget that everthing has a Hebrew-bias. But from Exodus onward, the essential narrative is probably correct.

Posted by: Chris Durnell at June 13, 2006 4:53 PM

Except for Exodus.

Posted by: oj at June 13, 2006 5:24 PM

We know how to make things cost less than they used to.

Posted by: Joseph Hertzlinger at June 13, 2006 10:22 PM
« DID HE BRING HIS PLASTIC JOHN KERRY? | Main | THE OTHER BEN DOESN'T WEAR HIS HELMET ENOUGH EITHER: »