June 14, 2006
I BEEN DONE SEEN ABOUT EVERYTHING, IF I EVER SEE THIS WHITE ELEPHANT FLY:
Singapore Air orders Boeings after new A380 delay (Reuters, 6/14/06)
Singapore Airlines ordered Boeing aircraft worth $4.52 billion after it was disappointed with new delays on the A380 superjumbo and is seeking compensation from Airbus parent EADS for the setback.Airbus revealed delays of at least six months in deliveries of the A380 on Tuesday, an embarrassment expected to blow a 2 billion euro ($2.5 billion) cash hole in Airbus parent EADS starting in 2007.
They'd have been more disappointed if they took delivery. Posted by Orrin Judd at June 14, 2006 8:56 AM
And I just laughed till I thought I'd die...
Posted by: Rick T. at June 14, 2006 10:33 AMCan you say "Concorde"?
Posted by: curt at June 14, 2006 10:38 AMGlad I was following my own advice about not drinking coffee while reading this blog.
Posted by: erp at June 14, 2006 11:46 AMWhile this is embarrassing for Airbus, their real problem is that they cannot match Boeing on the Dreamliner (the Boeing 787) with their A350, which is a market size representing probably three times the number of jumbo aircraft. And if they are devoting their minds and muscle to pushing the A380 out the door, then they will be even further behind on the A350.
Posted by: jim hamlen at June 14, 2006 2:33 PMThey've got at least 2 real problems. The 380's niche keeps getting smaller; I don't see Airbus selling enough to even recover its costs on this cattle car.
The new 350 is still conceptual -- at least 4 yrs behind the 787. And given the delays on the 380 would you bet your airline on the 350 showing up on schedule in 4 yrs or so?
Airbus will limp along on subsidies and enough orders to keep Boeing from gaining a monopoly, but it's had its day -- and it was a short one.
Posted by: curt at June 14, 2006 3:02 PMWe are very lucky that the people who run Boeing are not the people who ran the American auto industry.
Posted by: Chris Durnell at June 14, 2006 3:14 PMBoeing is lucky that it competing with socialists, not capitalists like the Japanese...
Posted by: curt at June 14, 2006 3:22 PMI wonder where any airline would park that brute at say, Tom Bradley Int terminal at LA?
Posted by: TEW at June 14, 2006 4:49 PM
Calling Japanese capitalists and European socialists doesn't explain anything. First, Japan had more than its share of government intervention and subsidy - ever hear of MITI? Second, the airplane market is intensely competitive, and Airbus acts towards those customers, not some bureaucrat who doesn't care about results.
Airbus kicked Boeing up, down and sideways in the late '90s and early '00s and was just as "socialist." But they placed their bets on the wrong hand, and Boeing bet right (plus radically changing the way they designed and built the dreamliner.)
The American automotive industry however, refused to learn their lessons, constantly bet on the wrong management fads, failed to prepare for market turns, and never really wanted to take on the Japanese. Their management was simply decadent.
Posted by: Chris Durnell at June 14, 2006 6:00 PMIt wasn't management, just unions. The Euros don't have the Japanese advantage there.
Posted by: oj at June 14, 2006 6:10 PMThe first thing Airbus did upon gaining parity with Boeing is build a trophy (the A380). That was the French gov't influence, not a management looking out for the shareholders. You see the same influence at work in every key decision Airbus makes -- hiring, subcontracting, siting, pricing, etc.
Posted by: curt at June 14, 2006 9:10 PM