June 30, 2006
HIROSHIMA, JIM CROW AND THE PATRIARCHY?
Superman eschews longtime patriot act (Tatiana Siegel, Hollywoodreporter.com, 6/30/06)
Ever since artist Joe Shuster and writer Jerry Siegel created the granddaddy of all comic book icons in 1932, Superman has fought valiantly to preserve "truth, justice and the American way." Whether kicking Nazi ass on the radio in the '40s or wrapping himself in the Stars and Stripes on TV during the Cold War or even rescuing the White House's flag as his final feat in "Superman II," the Krypton-born, Smallville-raised Ubermensch always has been steeped in unmistakable U.S. symbolism.Posted by David Cohen at June 30, 2006 12:22 PMBut in the latest film incarnation, scribes Michael Dougherty and Dan Harris sought to downplay Superman's long-standing patriot act. With one brief line uttered by actor Frank Langella, the caped superhero's mission transformed from "truth, justice and the American way" to "truth, justice and all that stuff."...
"We were always hesitant to include the term 'American way' because the meaning of that today is somewhat uncertain," Ohio native Dougherty explains. "The ideal hasn't changed. I think when people say 'American way,' they're actually talking about what the 'American way' meant back in the '40s and '50s, which was something more noble and idealistic."
They're lying. They changed it because they didn't want to offend foreigners, since the foreign box office actually matters these days. Plus, they think American are stupid...
Posted by: b at June 30, 2006 12:44 PMHow can one love a superhero who's afraid to take a stand? What eloquence is there in advocating "all that stuff"?
If they can't say "American way", how about at least more specificity: "truth,justice, and love"; "truth, justice, and goodness"; "truth, justice, and the pursuit of happiness."
But I'm curious: did the marketers ask for this change because standing for the "American way" would hinder international sales? Or because it would hinder domestic sales to liberals?
Posted by: pj at June 30, 2006 12:48 PMb - Actually, I think a lot of foreigners are curious about, and respectful of, the "American way." They want to know what that is so they can mimic it and achieve our success. It's as likely to be Americans that they're afraid of.
Posted by: pj at June 30, 2006 12:49 PMpj: Ah, but Hollywood THINKS that 100% of all foreigners hate the US, and so that drives their product. It's remarkable that an industry can be so ignorant about its customer base, but there are so few big studios and they're so interconnected that it can afford to be quite monopolistic in practice.
Posted by: b at June 30, 2006 1:16 PMDidn't plan on seeing it anyway.
Posted by: erp at June 30, 2006 1:33 PMAfter I read that, me neither.
Posted by: Sandy P at June 30, 2006 2:04 PMWho wants to see a movie put put by culture-traitors and folk enemies?
Posted by: Lou Gots at June 30, 2006 2:08 PMI wondered before the movie was released whether the phrase would become "truth, social justice, and the American way."
Posted by: jgm at June 30, 2006 2:49 PMWell, at least Supe still has the red, white and blue uniform (though I suppose if pressed, the filmmakers would say they represent the colors of France...).
Posted by: John at June 30, 2006 3:31 PMI read somewhere that the red has been changed from red-white-and-blue red into a muddy brownish red.
Posted by: erp at June 30, 2006 6:08 PMB,
"They're lying. They changed it because they didn't want to offend foreigners, since the foreign box office actually matters these days. Plus, they think American are stupid..."
I think you're closer to the mark with your second sentence. In a big-budget movie, there are invariably scenes shot twice, once with PG-13/R-rated language (and often, nudity) and then a network TV version with things toned down. So it would have been a snap to shoot the scene both ways and not offend American (or at least Red State) audiences. (Or even simpler, just redub the offending latter half of the "Truth, justice and..." line in foriegn versions) That they deliberately chose not to tells you all you need to know about what the little artists' enclave on the coast thinks about the rest of the country.
Posted by: Ed Driscoll at June 30, 2006 7:29 PMAmerica was more noble in the 1940s? Jim Crow, Jewish quotas in the Ivys, Japanese Internment. I see.
But by God George W. Bush was not President.
Posted by: Bob at June 30, 2006 8:55 PMIsn't the point the cynicism in Langella's remark?
Posted by: oj at June 30, 2006 8:55 PMIn WW11, we had a comic book hero called Johnny Canuck who used to single-handedly destroy panzer divisions before breakfast. I have no doubt if he came back today, he'd be a human rights activist or maybe a mediator.
Posted by: Peter B at July 1, 2006 5:56 AM