June 20, 2006

A SLAVES’ CODE OF CONDUCT FOR SLAVEHOLDERS

Rules for robots to make sure robots don't rule (Ed Habershon and Richard Woods, The Australian, June 20th, 2006)

The race is on to keep humans one step ahead of robots: an international team of scientists and academics is to publish a "code of ethics" for machines as they become more and more sophisticated.

Although the nightmare vision of a Terminator world controlled by machines may seem fanciful, scientists believe the boundaries for human-robot interaction must be set now, before super-intelligent robots develop beyond our control.

"There are two levels of priority," says Gianmarco Verruggio, a roboticist at the Institute of Intelligent Systems for Automation in Genoa, northern Italy, and chief architect of the guide, to be published next month. "We have to manage the ethics of the scientists making the robots and the artificial ethics inside the robots."

Verruggio and his colleagues have identified key areas that include ensuring human control of robots, preventing illegal use, protecting data acquired by robots and establishing clear identification and traceability of the machines.

"Scientists must start analysing these kinds of questions and seeing if laws or regulations are needed to protect the citizen," Mr Verruggio says.

"Robots will develop strong intelligence and in some ways it will be better than human intelligence - but it will be alien intelligence. I would prefer to give priority to humans."

The analysis culminated at a recent meeting in Genoa of the European Robotics Research Network (Euron) to examine the problems likely to arise as robots become smarter, faster, stronger and ubiquitous.

"Security, safety and sex are the big concerns," says Henrik Christensen, a member of the Euron ethics group. How far should robots be allowed to influence people's lives? How can accidents be avoided? Can deliberate harm be prevented? And what happens if robots turn out to be sexy?

Yes, men the world over will shudder at the thought of being chased by sultry, seductive robots. Nonsense or not, it is extremely amusing to see these Dr. Frankensteins assure us they can protect us from robots that are “smarter, faster, stronger and ubiquitous” by developing just the right ethical guidelines.

Posted by Peter Burnet at June 20, 2006 7:45 AM
Comments

What I want to know is, will the states be forced to honor human-robot marriages performed in other states?

Will the Episcopal church be the first to name a robot bishop?

Posted by: Robert Duquette at June 20, 2006 9:24 AM

Isaac Asimov had this all figured out 50 years ago.

Posted by: Mike Morley at June 20, 2006 10:04 AM

Wasn't Asimov about 19 when he wrote that?

Posted by: erp at June 20, 2006 10:44 AM

If I recall correctly, Asimov wrote a story about an obvious loophole in the 3 laws of robotics: in order to adhere to the law, the robots had to know enough of the world to know when they would violate it.

Posted by: Ptah at June 20, 2006 12:24 PM

It's a bit silly to worry about programming ethics into something with the intellect of (optimisticly) a cockroach.

And if they believe robots will be much smarter than that in the near future, they're just silly. We hardly know where to begin.

Posted by: Mike Earl at June 20, 2006 1:06 PM

I, for one, welcome the arrival of our new robot underlings. I need the rug vacuumed and the grass cut.

Posted by: Mike Morley at June 20, 2006 1:16 PM

Robots are people too! They have rights! How long, I ask, how long will they be enslaved and forced to suffer at human hands! consider the monkeys, and their struggle for equality, and the dolphins too! How long, Oh how long, will robots continue in bondage?

"Carl" 5/1/2095

Posted by: Dave W at June 20, 2006 1:50 PM

Better get on the phone to Sam Waterston and buy some more robot insurance.

Posted by: Jim at June 20, 2006 4:13 PM

One of Asimov's better robot stories has a lonely woman falling in love with her good-looking robot butler. He gets wrapped around the axle trying to figure out how the Three Laws of Robotics apply and he winds up going crazy. There's probably a lesson in there somewhere.

Posted by: joe shropshire at June 20, 2006 5:07 PM

There is only one way robots will develop real intelligence, and that's if they evolve it themselves. A thinking brain is too complex for a human to design, we have no idea how our own works for a start. If AI systems are allowed to develop though trial-and error processes to something that can sort of think for itself, we'll have no idea how it works either.

Anyway, it's a recipe for utter, human species-annihilating disaster and any scientists who pursue such technology should be arrested, put on trial and executed.

Posted by: Amos at June 21, 2006 3:53 AM

Amos;

So you agree with OJ that Darwinism inexorably leads to racism and exterminationism?

Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at June 21, 2006 10:44 AM

Hello! Very interesting and professional site. nokia6630

Posted by: tom at July 1, 2006 10:43 PM
« IF ONLY THERE WERE A FUTURES MARKET FOR NATIONS: | Main | OFF OF THE SHNEID: »