May 27, 2006

IT'S NOT A THRUWAY, IT'S A THIRDWAY (via Pepys):

For Whom the Road Tolls (MITCH DANIELS, 5/27/06, NY Times)

AS Americans hit the roads this Memorial Day weekend, debate is building about how to pay for the first-class transportation network that everyone agrees the United States requires. The money from gasoline taxes no longer comes close to meeting needs. Nationally, the gap between road-building needs and projected tax revenue is estimated in the hundreds of billions of dollars, and growing. Almost every governor I talk to faces a seemingly intractable shortfall.

When I became governor last year, my administration inherited a gap of at least $3 billion, equal then to 10 years of new road construction. Long-sought, long-delayed projects languished on the drawing board. For Indiana, a centrally located state that calls itself "the crossroads of America" and has great promise as a logistics and distribution capital, the opportunity cost of inaction was enormous.

A case can be made for higher gas taxes, but no economically rational or politically imaginable increase could close a gap this huge, even if leveraged through reckless borrowing. The only alternative to throwing in the towel was to bring to bear that handiest of revenue sources, Other People's Money.


For all the chatter about Dick Lugar as a Secretary of State or Evan Bayh on the Democrat ticket, it's Mr. Daniels who matters nationally.

Posted by Orrin Judd at May 27, 2006 7:51 PM
Comments

While this deal for the Indiana Toll Road is a good start, the state of IN would get an even more lucrative source of revenue by putting 2 HOT lanes down the middle of I-65 between Gary and Indianapolis. Get as much revenue/capacity out of the current Interstate footprint before attempting newer highway boondoggles.

Posted by: Brad S at May 27, 2006 8:11 PM

Let's see: privatizing roads, references to the Reason Foundation: it all sounds very libertarian to me, but OJ likes it, so it must instead be "Third Way"!

Posted by: PapayaSF at May 28, 2006 3:21 AM

Roads are a private luxury, not a public need.

Posted by: oj at May 28, 2006 8:16 AM

Mr. Judd, you are one funny guy! I trust you raise all your own food, weave your own clothes, and occasionally walk to the railroad station for supplies, right?

Posted by: PapayaSF at May 29, 2006 1:14 AM

The train line runs right behind our local strip mall.

Posted by: oj at May 29, 2006 8:14 AM

But there's no way the mall get all its supplies without roads, and no way everyone gets to the mall without roads.

Here's one way of defining a "luxury": if you can live without it, it's a luxury. Can we live without roads? Not really.

Posted by: PapayaSF at May 29, 2006 5:32 PM

Sure, we had roads when we rode horses. It's highways we shouldn't have built. Trains sufficed.

Posted by: oj at May 29, 2006 5:40 PM
« LET US NUKE THEM FOR YOU (via Tom Morin): | Main | THEIR DARK MATERIALS (via Pepys): »