April 6, 2006

WE CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALISTS PREFER TO BE CALLED THE ISRAEL LOBBY:

Evangelicals Rally Their
Flocks Behind Israel
(Bill Berkowitz, 06 April, 2006, Inter Press Service)

To prevent the George W. Bush administration from pressuring the Israelis into turning over even more land, Hagee, the pastor of San Antonio's Cornerstone Church and the head of a multi-million-dollar evangelical enterprise, recently brought together 400 Christian evangelical leaders -- representing as many as 30 million Christians -- for an invitation-only "Summit on Israel".

The result was the launch of a new pro-Israel lobbying group called Christians United for Israel (CUFI). [...]

Although not as well known on the national political scene as some of his evangelical brethren, Hagee has built an impressive evangelical empire and developed strong political ties to the Republican Party.

Since his 1978 "conversion" to Zionism, he has emphasised establishing and maintaining good relations with Israeli leaders and conservative sectors of the U.S. Jewish community. Over the years he has met with Israeli heads of state and carved out a special relationship with former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whose Likud Party performed dismally in the recent elections in Israel.

"Think of CUFI as a Christian version of American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)," the powerful pro-Israel lobby, Hagee told The Jerusalem Post in an interview a few days before his February summit. "We need to be able to respond instantly to Washington with our concerns about Israel. We must join forces to speak as one group and move as one body to [respond to] the crisis Israel will be facing in the near future."

Posted by Orrin Judd at April 6, 2006 7:53 AM
Comments

This article beautifully illustrates the illogic of the liberal mind, which as we know, can hold opposite and opposing opinions at the same time.

Against overwhelming evidence of the opposite, American Jews continue to support leftwing causes and vote for Democrats because they believe their worst enemies are fundamental Christians.

Posted by: erp at April 6, 2006 8:59 AM

Hagee blew it badly: he should have named it Christians United for Israeli Rights. The acronym would then have been CUFIR (rhymes with Kuffir, the derogatory term Muslims reserve for non-muslims when they're not calling them apostates, pagans, monkeys, or pigs.)

Posted by: Ptah at April 6, 2006 9:11 AM

Erp, I think they do so because they still prefer left wing causes and socialist governance. If not preference than perhaps it's a kneejerk reaction lingering from the past, as with African Americans. The good news is they're both coming around; perhaps slowly, but hopefully surely.

Both groups have read of and experienced cruel emotional/religious/ethnic/rightest reversals in their histories, recent and past, and trust may be a long time coming. The left may be perceived as shelter.

Posted by: Genecis at April 6, 2006 11:13 AM

Genecis: "Both groups have read of and experiennced cruel emotional/religious/ethnic/rightest[?]reversals in their histories. . .."

Here follows a hard teaching: a folk-enemy with a sympathetic grievance is still a folk-enemy. A Communist or Islamacist fifth-columnist whose grandparents were mistreated is still a Communist or Islamacist fifth-columnist.

Posted by: Lou Gots at April 6, 2006 12:31 PM

Apples and oranges Lou.

Posted by: Genecis at April 6, 2006 11:56 PM

how is it apples and oranges ? lou's position is pretty much axiomatic. if you see it differently i wouldn't mind an expanded answer.

Posted by: toe at April 7, 2006 12:02 PM

Toe, Lou and I are talking about two different "folks." I'm talking about Jews and blacks who choose to be Democrats, not my enemies. I was a Democrat once and I've changed ... for my own reasons, and I could change again ... for my own reasons. You may choose to think of Democrats as the "folk enemy" but I don't see them that way. American hard leftists, socialists, Marxists, peace at any price pacifists, environazis, anticapitalists all disgust me, the extent to which depending on their motives, but I don't yet see them as the enemy.

Caliphacists, North Korean Communists, Iranazis, Chavezites are my enemies ... not Americans with differing viewpoints.

Posted by: Genecis at April 7, 2006 12:50 PM

I am certainly not talking about Democrats, or even "liberal" Democrats. I am talking about minority individuals who reflexively choose oppositional-defiant positions to their country's interests because of resentment for real or imagined past slights.

Thus we see religious minorities motivated by anti-Christian bigotry and racial and/or national minorities motivated by ancient grievances.

The resentment is understandable, I want to say, but the enmity is nonetheless.

For this cause, the patriotism of racial minority members is particularly admirable. I read American History as the march of a white, Anglo nation. At various points in the past, this was very much at the expense and to the detriment of those whom we surpassed and overcame.

That was then. Now those racial and national minority individuals are our fellow-citizens and our neighbors. Accept that Blacks, Mexicans and Indians must change sides to join us.

I was pleased and proud to stand behind loyal Americans of every race and ethnicity in the Marine Corps, aware that many of them had a history to overcome.

Posted by: Lou Gots at April 7, 2006 11:20 PM
« YOUR FRENCH WORD OF THE DAY | Main | BADLY DRAWN BOMBERS: »