April 13, 2006
AFTER ALL, THEY FLED ISLAMIC STATES FOR A REASON:
Islam in Europe: Sending a message to the faithful back home (Charlemagne, Apr 12th 2006, The Economist)
Theologians have wrestled over the terms under which Muslims may live in non-Muslim lands. In the background is the belief that, if Muslim-friendly conditions do not exist, believers have a duty to migrate in search of more congenial places. But what makes the European Muslim experience challenging is that Muslims have migrated from their heartlands to places where they are a permanent minority. Theologians can hardly say that conditions in Europe are intolerable, when millions have voted with their feet. But given that Muslim life in Europe is a reality, on what terms should believers participate in secular western institutions? Some groups, especially the international Muslim Brotherhood, consider that they should participate vigorously in western, democratic institutions, even if they do not abandon their core belief that Muslim governance and law are ideal.In the teeth of traditional teaching, European Muslims are creating a distinctive form of Islam. They are driven by their experience as minorities; by a desire to overcome ethnic differences; and by the trauma of emigration. The first encourages Muslims to co-operate with non-Muslims; the second encourages them to look beyond their traditions; the third forces them to come to terms with change and modernity. Sayed Ghaemmagami, mufti of the Shias in Germany, argues that the situation of Muslims in Europe is unique. “The existence of an Islamic diaspora”, he says, “is totally different from the past and requires new thinking about relations with non-Islamic peoples.” The Koran calls for peaceful relations between Muslims and others, so Muslims should engage with their new countries and not set up parallel structures. “We must participate in all activities of life, as students, as businessmen, as social workers,” says Ahmed al-Rawi, president of the Federation of Islamic Organisations in Europe.
Muslims should also respect the difference between religion and politics. As Mr Ceric puts it, “a Muslim has allegiance to God as an act of faith but is a citizen with a duty to the state as an act of reason.” Mr Ghaemmagami says that “parallel societies are unIslamic. Muslims ought to feel accountable to the overall society and not manifest their customs in such a way as to run counter to the societies in which they live.”
Speaking of render unto Caesar... With that one doctrinal reform Islam will be rendered perfectly compatible with the End of History. Posted by Orrin Judd at April 13, 2006 5:05 PM
Means to the end of breeding Europe out of existence.
Posted by: Sandy P at April 13, 2006 5:24 PMIt will take more than that single (I admit, important) reform. The problem is that Islam cannot reform. Nor is it a religion of redemption. Nor does it have a personal God. When Bush said Muslims pray to the same God that we do, he was wrong.
Posted by: Kevin at April 13, 2006 8:12 PMHardly. And it will reform because it has no choice.
Posted by: oj at April 13, 2006 8:15 PMUmm, I was of the impression that Islam THOUGHT it WAS Caesar, in which case they'd have no trouble accepting "render unto caesar".
Posted by: Ptah at April 13, 2006 9:02 PMThe notion that it has to be Caesar seems fairly ahistorical, even if orthodox.
Posted by: oj at April 13, 2006 9:06 PMIt may happen, Kevin. Never doubt the capacity of any human to rationalize his or her way around an obstacle.
Posted by: Mikey at April 14, 2006 8:52 AM