February 17, 2006

THEY DON’T COME WITH TWENTY-ONE YEAR WARRANTIES

How we all became Jewish mothers (Steven Mintz, National Post, February 17th, 2006)

Anxiety is the hallmark of contemporary parenting. Today's parents agonize incessantly about their children's physical health, personality development, psychological well-being, and academic performance. From birth, parenthood is coloured by apprehension. Contemporary parents worry about Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and physical and sexual abuse, as well as more mundane problems, such as sleep disorders and hyperactivity.[...]

Contributing to parental anxiety are three decades of panics over children's well-being. Since the early 1970s, there has been recurrent alarm over stranger abductions, poisoned Halloween candies, childhood obesity, and pedophiles luring children over the Internet.

An information revolution has played a crucial role in transforming childhood. Today, over a quarter of two-year-olds have a TV set in their bedroom and half of all kids between seven and 16 have a cellphone. We're a long way from a world where a child had to climb on a bookcase to sneak a peek at Fannie Hill or a father's collection of Playboy magazines. Now, pornography can be found with a click of a mouse.

One of the most striking developments is a phenomon known as "age compression." Fashion, movies, TV shows, and videogames originally targeted at teenage audiences are now consumed by tweens or even younger children. Barbie no longer appeals to 10- or 12-year olds. Instead, she is coveted by three- and four-year-olds.

Have these changes enhanced or harmed children's well-being? By many measures, today's kids are doing much better than their parents. Despite high rates of divorce, single parenthood, and out-of-wedlock births, children, with the notable exception of those in poverty, are healthier, safer, and better off financially. Kids miss fewer days of school than in 1960 and youth crime has fallen to levels not seen since the early 1960s. Teenage smoking, drug abuse, pregnancy, and suicide have shrunk. Girls and children of colour have more role models and opportunities than ever before. Test scores are as high as ever.

Yet all is not well. More children suffer from disabilities and chronic diseases than ever before. These include autism, asthma, and Attention Deficit Disorders. The onset of clinical depression occurs earlier.

Other problems are more difficult to quantify. The historian Daniel Kline has identified three forms of psychological violence directed at contemporary children:

- the "violence of expectations," parents' tendency to push kids beyond their capabilities;
- the "violence of labeling," the tendency to call normal childish behaviour pathological; and
- the "violence of representation," the exploitation of children by opportunistic marketers, politicians, and well-meaning advocacy groups.

Today's society is child-obsessed. But whether contemporary society is child-friendly is another matter. We now have a private obsession with perfecting our own children. And this obsession has come at a cost. It has restricted children's geography and play and has transformed childhood from a time of risk, experimentation, and freedom into a rigorously monitored and structured stage of life.

Our challenge is to allow childhood to be an odyssey of self-discovery, not merely preparation for a premature adulthood.

Apart from slandering Jewish mothers, Mr. Mintz misses the whole point. It isn’t just that we are overly-protective of our children. It is that the collapse of the spiritual and moral in modern life has left many of us unable to see any difference between raising our children and taking care of our cars.

Posted by Peter Burnet at February 17, 2006 5:00 PM
Comments

i see "parents" all the time. it's very sad (for the children) but there isn't alot you can do for the poor lambs.

Posted by: toe at February 17, 2006 5:55 PM

It could also be that we are seeing a reverting to the norm. The long period of adolescence , the idea of a "teenager" is recent. For example, Romeo and Juliet were in their early teens, and you had military commanders-in-chief like Octavian and Alexander who were barely out of their teens when they started. And wasn't the bar mitzvah really to mark the final step, not the first. of many, in "becoming a man"?

Not saying this is good or better, just an observation.

And I like the way this Kline guy has bastardized "violence" to mean "something of which I disapprove."

Posted by: Raoul Ortega at February 17, 2006 6:59 PM

Maybe we wouldn't be so concerned about our children if we didn't have dangers and pitfalls thrust into our faces at every turn.

Car seats that would be over-engineered for a trip to Pluto, helmets, wrist and shin guards for roller skating and bike riding around the neighborhood, sun block good for the surface of the sun, and on and on. It's amazing the kids don't hide behind the couch and refuse to come out.

Posted by: erp at February 17, 2006 7:08 PM

i suspect there is less bad things happening to kids (here) than in years past, it's just that we hear of every bad thing that happens anywhere in the world. this causes a false impression that bad things are more prevalent.

Posted by: toe at February 17, 2006 8:25 PM

toe:

You mean nobody noticed depression and anorexia in the past?

Posted by: Peter B at February 17, 2006 8:30 PM

terrible. a far cry from a catcher in the rye.

Posted by: ept at February 17, 2006 9:37 PM

I get no backchat from my car.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at February 17, 2006 9:53 PM

. . . or kick from champagne, Robert.

Posted by: obc at February 17, 2006 10:01 PM

consumption tends to obscure anorexia.

Posted by: toe at February 18, 2006 12:58 AM

Peter,

You mean nobody noticed depression and anorexia in the past?
Not if was happening in the next county or beyond. Posted by: Kirk Parker at February 18, 2006 2:01 AM

Peter,
I'm curious about the "collapse of the spiritual and the moral in modern life". We're told that religion is as robust as it ever was. Are you saying that there is a difference between religiosity and spirituality, or religiosity and morality? How do you define the differences?

Posted by: Robert Duquette at February 18, 2006 10:42 AM

Robert:

America isn't modern. Judeo-Christianity isn't robust elsewhere in the West.

Posted by: oj at February 18, 2006 10:53 AM

They wonder about overparenting when he characterized high expectations as violence? At least part of the reason people overparent now is the fear that some authority is going to be called in if you don't seem to be giving the proper amount of anxiety to Junior's low reading rate in kindergarten.

Posted by: sharon at February 18, 2006 11:43 AM

Sharon, if only some authority would care about junior's low reading rate in any grade. The only thing authorities care about is junior being a good little boy and sitting quietly while the teacher fills his head leftwing propaganda and if he shows any little boy high spirits, it's Ritalin time.

Posted by: erp at February 18, 2006 1:35 PM
« NOT PRINCIPALS, MARKET PRINCIPLES: | Main | YOU MEAN HE DIDN'T CALL FOR HIS RESIGNATION?: »