February 21, 2006
THERE GOES THE NEIGHBOURHOOD
Academics fight rise of creationism at universities (Duncan Campbell, The Guardian, February 21st, 2006)
A growing number of science students on British campuses and in sixth form colleges are challenging the theory of evolution and arguing that Darwin was wrong. Some are being failed in university exams because they quote sayings from the Bible or Qur'an as scientific fact and at one sixth form college in London most biology students are now thought to be creationists.Earlier this month Muslim medical students in London distributed leaflets that dismissed Darwin's theories as false. Evangelical Christian students are also increasingly vocal in challenging the notion of evolution.
In the United States there is growing pressure to teach creationism or "intelligent design" in science classes, despite legal rulings against it. Now similar trends in this country have prompted the Royal Society, Britain's leading scientific academy, to confront the issue head on with a talk entitled Why Creationism is Wrong. The award-winning geneticist and author Steve Jones will deliver the lecture and challenge creationists, Christian and Islamic, to argue their case rationally at the society's event in April.
"There is an insidious and growing problem," said Professor Jones, of University College London. "It's a step back from rationality. They (the creationists) don't have a problem with science, they have a problem with argument. And irrationality is a very infectious disease as we see from the United States."[...]
Most of the next generation of medical and science students could well be creationists, according to a biology teacher at a leading London sixth-form college. "The vast majority of my students now believe in creationism," she said, "and these are thinking young people who are able and articulate and not at the dim end at all. They have extensive booklets on creationism which they put in my pigeon-hole ... it's a bit like the southern states of America." Many of them came from Muslim, Pentecostal or Baptist family backgrounds, she said, and were intending to become pharmacists, doctors, geneticists and neuro-scientists.
Remember the good old days when the creationists all drove used pick-ups and chewed baccy?
The academics challenge is to deny a voice to two of the (Many of them came from Muslim, Pentecostal or Baptist family backgrounds) groups, without having the third, chop their heads off.
Posted by: AllenS at February 21, 2006 7:43 AMAlso, their strategy of grouping Intelligent Design with "young earth" creationism is back-firing. Big mistake.
Posted by: L. Rogers at February 21, 2006 9:57 AML. Rogers:
Indeed. But it isn't really evolution they're defending; it's the preeminance of science as the final arbiter of truth. They can't tolerate even the soft form of ID most of the public believes in.
Posted by: Mike Earl at February 21, 2006 10:32 AMHeresy I tell you. They want to commit heresy in my church. We have the one and only answer and will not tolerate any deviation!
Posted by: Genecis at February 21, 2006 1:29 PM