February 11, 2006
THE GOOD GUY'S ANSWER TO PALPATINE:
The Poisoning of Ukraine's President (Lionel Beehner, 2/8/06, Seed Magazine)
Under the radar, in early December, tests came back from three undisclosed labs in Belgium, Britain and Germany, confirming what many scientists already suspected: In September, 2004, Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko had been poisoned. His blood samples did indeed contain an abnormally high level of dioxin, 1,000 times the accepted level. One year later, Yushchenko's face—with its strong jaw and movie-star features, perfect politician material—remains badly pockmarked. [...]Posted by Matt Murphy at February 11, 2006 2:46 PM"We knew right away he was poisoned because his skin symptom was very symptomatic of this kind of dioxin," said Mykola Prodanchuk, one of Ukraine's top toxicologists and the director of the Kiev-based Institute of Eco-Hygiene and Toxicology. [...]
The early suspect: Russian intelligence. After all, it is no secret that Yushchenko, a pro-Western reformer, was not the Kremlin's preferred candidate in 2004. Moreover, Russia's KGB has a long history of failed assassination attempts of political figures, stretching as far back as the time of Rasputin, Tsarina Alexsandra's mystic who was nearly poisoned in 1916 by pastries laced with cyanide.
During the 69 years of Soviet rule, the KGB took poison assassination plots to a new level of sophistication. In 1957, for instance, a Soviet agent assassinated Ukrainian émigré leader Lev Rebet in Munich using a cyanide gas pistol. In 1978, a Bulgarian agent at a London bus stop used an umbrella loaded with ricin pellets to inject a Soviet defector with poison. But dioxin poisoning is un-chartered territory, even for Russian spooks.
If this poisoning was an attempt on Yushchenko's life, why did the assailant not use a stronger substance like strychnine? After all, dioxin is not commonly used as a tool for assassination and the substance can be detected in the blood for years after initial contact.
"Dioxin poisoning is not a good way to [kill someone]," said Hryhorczuk. "No human we know of has died from acute dioxin poisoning." [...]
Investigators remain baffled by the case. Scientists are still studying Yushchenko's symptoms in a search for answers. Meanwhile, Ukraine's president seems to have accepted his fate—and disfigured face—as the price for trying to reform his country's rough-edged politics, a system yet to shed its Soviet past.
As I recall, although they had a tough time, Rasputin did end up dead.
Glad they mised Yushchenko.
Posted by: jdkelly at February 11, 2006 4:22 PMYes, but they bludgeoned the monk to death.
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at February 11, 2006 4:29 PM"Dioxin poisoning is not a good way to [kill someone]," said Hryhorczuk. "No human we know of has died from acute dioxin poisoning." [...]
But Greenpeace told me that dioxin was twice as bad as any other toxin.
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at February 11, 2006 4:30 PMYes Robert, but the assassination was sucessful. I think he actually drowned after they threw him in the Volga. He's probably hanging out with Elvis.
Posted by: jdkelly at February 11, 2006 5:08 PMDioxin as one of the most poisonous toxins known.. to lab mice. It kills mice faster than you can say Andromeda Strain.
What was later discovered (by accident) is that dioxin is not particularly toxic to humans even in megadoses. All it does is create skin blisters.
What probably happened is that the KGB googled for "strongest poison", and they found the breathless warnings from environmentalist websites, and they said "yep that's the ticket".
Posted by: Gideon at February 11, 2006 5:41 PMjdkelly:
It was a laborious five-year process, but yes -- they did finally kill Rasputin.
Posted by: Matt Murphy at February 11, 2006 5:43 PMI suspect they wanted, not to kill him, but to disfigure him so that he'd withdraw from politics.
Posted by: too true at February 11, 2006 6:00 PM"used an umbrella loaded with ricin pellets to inject a Soviet defector with poison."
I long for the days of super secret agents using methods like this.
Stalin was never so subtle. Ask Sergei Kirov, Walter Krivitsky, or Trotsky. Or millions of others.
Posted by: jim hamlen at February 11, 2006 9:32 PMThe real issue with dioxin isn't that it's toxic but that it's very durable.
Posted by: Mike Earl at February 11, 2006 9:35 PMGideon: I would not be surprised to hear about the CIA using Dioxin thinking it might kill the target, but the KGB. I am very disillusioned.
"The real issue with dioxin isn't that it's toxic but that it's very durable."
So is concrete, so what?
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at February 12, 2006 1:01 AM