February 7, 2006

NO ONE WAS EVER THRILLED TO GET A FAX (via Bryan Francoeur):

Era Ends: Western Union Stops Sending Telegrams (Robert Roy Britt, 1/31/06, LiveScience)

After 145 years, Western Union has quietly stopped sending telegrams.

On the company's web site, if you click on "Telegrams" in the left-side navigation bar, you're taken to a page that ends a technological era with about as little fanfare as possible:

"Effective January 27, 2006, Western Union will discontinue all Telegram and Commercial Messaging services. We regret any inconvenience this may cause you, and we thank you for your loyal patronage. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact a customer service representative."

The decline of telegram use goes back at least to the 1980s, when long-distance telephone service became cheap enough to offer a viable alternative in many if not most cases. Faxes didn't help. Email could be counted as the final nail in the coffin.


"Progress" never adds savor to life.

Posted by Orrin Judd at February 7, 2006 11:45 AM
Comments

True, outhouses had "savor".

Posted by: Mike Beversluis at February 7, 2006 11:55 AM

What? Didn't Expedition Everest add savor to your son's life? Are we supposed to stick with Big Thunder Mountain forever?

Posted by: pj at February 7, 2006 12:01 PM

He'd have been just as happy riding the Mighty Mouse at a local fair thirty years ago and I wouldn't have to leave NH.

Posted by: oj at February 7, 2006 12:19 PM

I thought that the proper emotion upon receiving a telegram (not that I ever did) was terror.

Posted by: David Cohen at February 7, 2006 12:20 PM

David:

Ah, it's the not knowing that's thrilling.

Posted by: oj at February 7, 2006 12:31 PM

N109 84 DL=HANOVER NH 22 1055A
MR ORRIN C JUDD =
BROTHERSJUDD.COM BASEMENT HANOVER NH

THE 19TH CENTURY IS OVER STOP GET OVER IT STOP MOVE ON WITH YOUR LIFE STOP QUIT PINING FOR A PAST THAT NEVER EXISTED STOP
SINCERELY
HISTORY

Posted by: Bryan at February 7, 2006 12:37 PM

Stop pining for a past that never existed? Aren't those fighting words on a conservative website?

Posted by: Chris Durnell at February 7, 2006 12:45 PM

The struggle against Evil must never be abandoned.

Posted by: oj at February 7, 2006 12:46 PM

Well, there goes another cover for the Landshark.

Posted by: Twn at February 7, 2006 12:52 PM

Bryan -

Pretty funny.

And here is OJ disseminating his viewpoints via tin cans and string...

Posted by: Bruce Cleaver at February 7, 2006 12:52 PM

Bruce:

Only because you all won't come over and sit in my basement and chat every evening.

Posted by: oj at February 7, 2006 12:56 PM

Has anyone on this blog ever received or sent a telegram?

Posted by: Robert Duquette at February 7, 2006 12:56 PM

Robert:

You never saw your grandad get or send one?

Posted by: oj at February 7, 2006 1:02 PM

Not me! A telegram was sent on the auspicious occasion of my birth, but I didn't have much to do with that.
The non-existent past that Orrin is pining for is the past where everyone was always polite to each other simply because they rode trains and if only the government forced everyone to ride trains again we would enter a new golden age.
I'm a conservative, so I think that human nature is pretty unchanging regardless of what lefty social engineers like Orrin want. People were nasty to each other in the past on trains, they're nasty to each other now in cars and they'll be nasty to each other when our great grandchildren are mentally jaunting from place to place.

Posted by: Bryan at February 7, 2006 1:06 PM

Bryan:

Highways were, of course, engineered by the Military-Indistrial complex, which is why they're anti-human.

Posted by: oj at February 7, 2006 1:11 PM

Does this also mean the end of the Candygram?

Posted by: John at February 7, 2006 1:21 PM

Railroads were engineered by what passed for the Military-Industrial complex in the 19th century. Telegrams were the 19th century equivalent of the fax machine. You've got no legs to stand on in you assertion that trains and telegrams are somehow more pro-human than cars and faxes. All you've got is that you like them and you're going to go through all sorts of intellectual contortions to somehow make this into a conservative vs. liberal thing. To liberals like yourself the personal is the political, so it can't just be a matter of "Hey, I like trains." No, it's got to be some kind of crazy overriding political theory that trains somehow embiggen the human spirit and cars tear it down. They are only just human constructs made of steel and wire.
PS: Welcome back, you sockdologizing
old mantrap! This place was a tomb without you!

Posted by: Bryan at February 7, 2006 1:40 PM

Bryan:

Obviously it would be better if we didn't go anywhere at all, but trains were at least a democratic and sociable means of transportation. They were the least bad alternative.

Posted by: oj at February 7, 2006 1:46 PM

You can still use this: http://www.retro-gram.com/

Posted by: Guy T. at February 7, 2006 2:34 PM

You never invite us, and you're probably out of beer anyway.

Posted by: joe shropshire at February 7, 2006 2:38 PM

And if we came over, wouldn't that violate the time zone rule for most of us?

Posted by: jdkelly at February 7, 2006 4:14 PM

jd:

Most of you need out of your godforsaken timezones.

Posted by: oj at February 7, 2006 4:18 PM

Now if we can get the banking industry out of the lobby long enough for e-mail to do to "wiring money" what it did to the telegram.

The cost of sending money via web/cell should be about a half-cent, but banks, anti-terror legislation, and Western Union do what they can to make sure you have to pay $15-20 to wire money.

Posted by: Bruno at February 7, 2006 4:30 PM

John: Candygram lives.

P.S. the man who invented the Candygram was the father of a friend of mine. After the invention he moved to LA to run the company. My friend grew up in Beverly Hills. The next time I saw my friend was freshman year at the UofC. The poor kid had learned some bad lessons in 90210. He got into drugs and "new left" politics. Within year or two he dropped out and moved to Bolinas. He is probably still there delivering groceries and cleaning septic tanks for a living.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at February 7, 2006 4:45 PM

"To liberals like yourself the personal is the political, so it can't just be a matter of "Hey, I like trains."

David, you have convinced another.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at February 7, 2006 4:47 PM

Bryan: very funny. BTW, what does "sockdologizing" mean?

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at February 7, 2006 4:48 PM

OJ: Telegrams were usually a sign of serious illness or death. That is why nobody missed them.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at February 7, 2006 4:51 PM

Robert:

Only rarely, but a fax telling you they're dead is unbearable.

Posted by: oj at February 7, 2006 4:56 PM

BTW Donald Sensing has a post on the end of the telegram, and another on notifying next of kin, which links to a very good series in the Rocky Mountain News.

Posted by: joe shropshire at February 7, 2006 5:20 PM

So "Progress" never adds savor to life? Ummm, didn't "progress" create telegrams in the first place?

Guy T. beat me too it: Retro-Gram is a hoot.

Bryan: Funniest comment in weeks.

Posted by: PapayaSF at February 7, 2006 5:39 PM

I am left wondering how long any of us could sit in OJ's basement with him before violence ensued.

And, BTW, I have recieved a telegram or three, but not in the last couple decades.

Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at February 7, 2006 5:40 PM

Robert: the words "sockdologizing old mantrap" are probably the last words Abraham Lincoln ever heard.

Posted by: joe shropshire at February 7, 2006 5:47 PM

Papaya:

Yes, life was better before telegrams.

Posted by: oj at February 7, 2006 5:52 PM

OJ,
No, my grandparents had a phone.

Posted by: Robert Duquette at February 7, 2006 7:23 PM

Telegrams were cheaper.

Posted by: oj at February 7, 2006 7:34 PM

Two summers ago, I was riding in the car with my good friend Dan, his wife, and son Andy; Andy is the same age as my oldest (now 13). Dan mentioned that his first job was delivering telegrams by bicycle in downtown Cleveland.

Andy says, in absolute innocence, "Dad, what's a telegram?"

My reply, "It's what we had before we had e-mail."

Posted by: Mike Morley at February 7, 2006 8:57 PM

I recieved, from my Congressman, my first and only telegram in my life in early 1975 congratulating me on my appointment to the US Air Force Academy. I still have it.

Posted by: WildWzl at February 8, 2006 12:05 AM

And no one saves an e-mail or fax.

Posted by: oj at February 8, 2006 12:17 AM

OJ:

I've given some thought to the modern situation regarding email, which is that many early communications and thoughts of future historical figures will be utterly lost when they go into the "delete" bin. At least with letters and telegrams, there was a chance this stuff would survive for future examination.

Posted by: Matt Murphy at February 8, 2006 1:54 AM

Future generations won't get the "Eastern Onion" jokes in old Bugs Bunny cartoons.

Posted by: Bob Hawkins at February 8, 2006 12:26 PM

Progress never adds savor to life.

When I read that, I thought of you and prehistoric SpongeBob, sitting around eating coral. Enjoying the smell. Wondering which part to scratch the bugs out of today.

Ahhh....

I think you are conflating the timeline - what you should have said was "Any progress after today is only going to take the savor out of life as we know it". Which people have believed for millenia.

Posted by: jim hamlen at February 8, 2006 1:06 PM

No. All "Progress" after the 19th Century and most after 1776.

Posted by: oj at February 8, 2006 1:13 PM

Matt: Email is impossible to get rid of.

Posted by: David Cohen at February 8, 2006 7:11 PM

David Cohen:

In general, yes, but I'm talking particulars.

Posted by: Matt Murphy at February 8, 2006 7:58 PM

If you folks would use a rather modern system like Google, you would find out that the prototype of the fax was invented -- need I say by a Scot? -- in 1842, though it was not really commercially viable until 1924, when various advances had been made. This should, I am sure, comfort OJ greatly.

Posted by: Bernard Hassan at February 8, 2006 11:19 PM
« CONSTITUTIONAL SEPARATION ISN'T OPTIONAL: | Main | WAITING ON A FRIEND (via Mike Daley): »