January 12, 2006

WHAT'S WITH THE WEEPING POTTED PLANT?:

Senate's swirling winds (Joan Vennochi, January 12, 2006, Boston Globe)

Alito sounds conversational and knowledgeable as he discusses cases he ruled upon. He also appears human, from the occasional quaver in his Garden State-accented voice to the balding circle of scalp visible when the camera shoots from behind.

His interrogators often sound arrogant and sanctimonious. That doesn't mean questions from Democrats about abortion or the limits on executive power are meritless. But, particularly on Tuesday, they were posed so poorly and loquaciously that Alito won, or at least, never lost a round.

There are other, tangential losers, such as Princeton -- and not only on the matter involving the Concerned Alumni of Princeton University. Alito disparaged the university he attended in the late 1960s and early 1970s, telling senators: ''I saw some very smart people and very privileged people behaving irresponsibly, and I couldn't help making a contrast between some of the worst of what I saw on campus and the good sense and the decency of the people back in my own community."

And what about the requisite adoring wife, peeking over her husband's shoulder as he stands at the brink of the biggest job of his life? Why is that old-fashioned picture of spousal devotion considered such an important element of the nominee's presentation? The risk of wife-as-prop was demonstrated yesterday. Mrs. Alito broke down in tears and left the hearing when the going got rough.


Geez, Ms Vennochi is so dismissive of women she could write for CAP's magazine.

Posted by Orrin Judd at January 12, 2006 5:18 PM
Comments

wonder if vennochi would use the same phrases to describe the crone that almost fainted when she heard what larry summers said about women and science.

Posted by: toe at January 12, 2006 5:33 PM

And Alito's comment on Princeton as quoted could probably apply to just about any brand-name university back then. Or does this Vennochi think 60's era stupidity was limited to just Princeton?

(And why isn't there a "Concerned Alumni of Chicago"? I hear rumors that they are permitting "fun" on campus, and because of that the UofC's coveted Last Place in the ranking of "Party Schools" is in jeopardy.)

Posted by: Raoul Ortega at January 12, 2006 6:25 PM

"risk of wife as prop"? What risk? The tears hurt whom? The answer is not Mr. Alito. Seems the "prop" worked out fine.

Posted by: Bob at January 12, 2006 7:12 PM

Vennochi is a typical Boston liberal writer - what is fine for a Democrat to do is not ok for a GOPer to do. Remember this is one of those political types who believe Ted Kennedy is the greatest politician ever.

Posted by: AWW at January 12, 2006 8:14 PM

"But this was in the late 1960s and early 1970s. It was a time of turmoil at colleges and universities. And I saw some very smart and privileged people behaving irresponsibly."

Renounce the 60s and they will hate you. The last few years have been about the boomers discovering that they are old farts whose supposed best years were in fact wasted.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at January 13, 2006 1:53 AM

Are you now, or have you ever been a member of...

Posted by: Noel at January 13, 2006 2:25 AM
« HOW DO YOU SAY "THE SHIP BE SINKIN'" IN CANADIAN?: | Main | OF COURSE, MCCARTHYISM HAD THE ADVANTAGE OF BEING POPULAR: »