January 25, 2006
THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS MIXED PROGRESS:
The Realities of Exporting Democracy: A Year After Bush Recast Foreign Policy, Progress Remains Mixed (Peter Baker, January 25, 2006, Washington Post)
In the year since Bush redefined U.S. foreign policy in his second inaugural address to make the spread of democracy the nation's primary mission, the clarion-call language has resonated in the dungeons and desolate corners of the world. But soaring rhetoric has often clashed with geopolitical reality and competing U.S. priorities.While the administration has enjoyed notable success in promoting liberty in some places, it has applied the speech's principles inconsistently in others, according to analysts, activists, diplomats and officials. Beyond its focus on Iraq, Washington has stepped up pressure on repressive regimes in countries such as Belarus, Burma and Zimbabwe -- where the costs of a confrontation are minimal -- while still gingerly dealing with China, Pakistan, Russia and other countries with strategic and trade significance.
In the Middle East, where the administration has centered its attention, it has promoted elections in the Palestinian territories such as today's balloting for parliament, even as it directed money aimed at clandestinely preventing the radical Islamic group Hamas from winning. And although it has now suspended trade negotiations with Egypt, it did not publicly announce the move, nor has it cut the traditionally generous U.S. aid to Cairo.
"The glass is a quarter full, but we need more of it," said Jennifer Windsor, executive director of Freedom House, a group that promotes democracy. "The administration deserves credit, but it's just a start."
In its annual survey ranking nations as free, partly free or not free, the group upgraded nine nations or territories in 2005 and downgraded four. Among those deemed freer were Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan, where peaceful revolutions overthrew entrenched governments; Lebanon, where Syrian occupation troops were pressured to withdraw; and Afghanistan and the Palestinian territories, where trailblazing elections were held. Overall, Freedom House concluded, "the past year was one of the most successful for freedom" since the survey began in 1972.
It took over two hundred years for us to liberalize Europe whereas it's looking like it'll take less than a decade to liberalize the Middle East. It'd be nice to get it done quicker, but you'd have to say the pace thus far is remarkable. Posted by Orrin Judd at January 25, 2006 8:25 AM
One decade is unwarranted optimism. There is no reason to believe that regimes that are democratizing now will not backslide. The Middle East will work towards democracy the way South America has, in fits and starts.
Posted by: Brandon at January 25, 2006 12:00 PMSouth America is democratic, it's leaders are just crappy. Democracy isn't a good in itself.
Posted by: oj at January 25, 2006 12:17 PMWhat's your point? We've been trying to democratize it for 150 years.
Posted by: Brandon at January 25, 2006 2:15 PMNo we haven't. We left it in French/British colonial clutches after WWI or we could have avoided 9-11 and the rest.
Posted by: oj at January 25, 2006 5:37 PMYou misunderstood me, sorry. It's South America that we've been trying to democratize for 150 years.
Posted by: Brandon at January 25, 2006 5:44 PMWe backed every two-bit dictator in Latin America as long as they got our fruit here while it was ripe.
Posted by: oj at January 25, 2006 6:00 PMguess allende' was a little late with the winter grape shipment :)
Posted by: toe at January 25, 2006 10:24 PM