January 19, 2006

SURPRISE! INTELLIGENT DESIGN AGAIN:

New Study Reveals Neanderthals Were As Good At Hunting As Early Modern Humans (University of Chicago Press Journals, 1/19/06)

The disappearance of Neanderthals is frequently attributed to competition from modern humans, whose greater intelligence has been widely supposed to make them more efficient as hunters. However, a new study forthcoming in the February issue of Current Anthropology argues that the hunting practices of Neanderthals and early modern humans were largely indistinguishable, a conclusion leading to a different explanation, also based on archaeological data, to explain the disappearance of the Neanderthals. This study has important implications for debates surrounding behavioral evolution and the practices that eventually allowed modern humans like ourselves to displace other closely-related species.

"Each population was equally and independently capable of acquiring and exploiting critical information pertaining to animal availability and behavior," write the anthropologists, from the University of Connecticut, University of Haifa, Hebrew University, and Harvard University.

The researchers use new archaeological data from a Middle- and Upper-Paleolithic rock shelter in the Georgian Republic dated to 60,000�20,000 years ago to contest some prior models of the perceived behavioral and cognitive differences between Neanderthals and modern humans. Instead, the researchers suggest that developments in the social realm of modern human life, allowing routine use of distant resources and more extensive division of labor, may be better indicators of why Neanderthals disappeared than hunting practices.

Posted by Orrin Judd at January 19, 2006 12:00 AM
Comments

Interesting. I always thought it was because our ancestors were better at war than the Neanderthals (c.f., the French).

Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at January 19, 2006 3:42 PM

It's magic I tell you.

Posted by: Genecis at January 19, 2006 8:39 PM

Obviously, homo sapiens sapiens and homo neanderthalis were in "competition" the way Castillians and Aztecs were in competition in 1520. The mechanism of competition was very likely the same: likewise the result.

The article really does not dispute this; it only implies that the "competition" was sort of like that between K-Mart and Target. When we read it closely, it strongle supports the military competition hypothesis. Social organization, division of labor, technology, all put a people on the curve which leads to the military threshold.

Posted by: Lou Gots at January 19, 2006 10:26 PM
« IRAN IS CERTAINLY MORE SERIOUS THAN MR. JENKINS: | Main | FILIBUSTER-PROOF: »