January 6, 2006

STILL ANTICIPATING $100/BBL OIL

Upswings and downfalls (Jephraim P Gundzik, Asia Times, 01/06/2006)

Despite rising inflation in the United States, more accommodative monetary policy in the early months of 2006 will accelerate US economic growth. This stronger growth will push international oil prices toward US$100 per barrel by mid-year, causing much higher global inflation and foreign capital flight from the US.

With its credibility diminishing, the US Federal Reserve will be forced to tighten monetary policy dramatically, leading to an abrupt slowdown in global economic growth in the second half of 2006.

Weren't oil prices supposed to hit $100/bbl by the end of last year?

Hope Despair springs eternal in some quarters, it seems.

Posted by kevin_whited at January 6, 2006 12:26 PM
Comments

Econopundit posted this:

Financial Times reports:

China indicated on Thursday it could begin to diversify its rapidly growing foreign exchange reserves away from the US dollar and government bonds -- a potential shift with significant implications for global financial and commodity markets.

Economists estimate that more that 70 per cent of the reserves are invested in US dollar assets, which has helped to sustain the recent large US deficits. If China were to stop acquiring such a large proportion of dollars with its reserves -- currently accumulating at about $15bn/mo...it could put heavy downward pressure on the greenback....

---

It could get really messy there soon.

Posted by: Sandy P at January 6, 2006 1:08 PM

"foreign capital flight from the US"

Why? Our debt to GNP ratio and economy will still be the best in the world. Won't high oil prices hurt China also?

Posted by: Bob at January 6, 2006 1:10 PM

We're at the point right now where even at $50 a barrel, the number of drilling areas that were previously non-viable that now are is still significantly higher than 3-4 years ago. As the new sources come on line that will increase the downward pressure on oil prices, barring some outside circumstance such as a major terrorist attack on oil production facilities in a key area or Hugo Chavez getting his panties in a wad and suddenly shutting down all production in Venezuela.

Posted by: John at January 6, 2006 1:36 PM

Sandy: diversifying rapidly growing reserves is not the same thing as capital flight. If you've got time, click on the last link in the Econopundit article (it's a pdf so it'll take awhile to download.)

Posted by: joe shropshire at January 6, 2006 1:38 PM

How'd you do that cross out thing?

Posted by: oj at January 6, 2006 4:04 PM

Sandy:

Here's the question such folks never ask themselves: what other reserve is safe?

Posted by: oj at January 6, 2006 4:06 PM

Look, let's stop kidding around and drill ANWAR.Especially if $100.00 oil is possibly in the cards. If the Republicans can't push it through the Democrats will when they get into power, the @#@$%&* hypocrites.

Posted by: Genecis at January 6, 2006 4:11 PM

x x x x
x x
Hope Despair reality springs eternal.
x x x x

I told you already OJ, by the end of 2006.

Posted by: Robert Duquette at January 6, 2006 4:12 PM

That's a strike tag: [strike] text [/strike]. Does not work in comments.

Posted by: joe shropshire at January 6, 2006 4:19 PM

I know that, OJ, and love telling the Euros where else is the world going to put their money?

the Magic Kingdom?

Africa?

Central/South Americas?

Europe?

No place else to go.

What's even better is the Euros will really, really be depressed cos there's no one else to "counter-balance" US.

Posted by: Sandy P at January 6, 2006 4:22 PM

There could very well be a terrorist attack on production facilities (still disgracefully underprotected), and Hugo Chavez' panties could also easily get wadded, especially now that he has a new running buddy in Bolivia. I know Bolivia has no oil, but Hugo's bound to feel emboldened with a new Socialist pal and ready to poke us with a stick just to see us jump.

And no, the Dems won't drill ANWR. We'll continue to look for alternative energy sources, and oil sources that aren't in such vulnerable areas.

I only agree with Thomas Friedman sporadically, but his column in today's NY Times addresses the energy issue, and he makes several excellent points.

Posted by: apc at January 6, 2006 5:30 PM

Yes. There's the rub. Where will they put their billions? Hmm.

That was my first thought when reading the intro. Seems odd that economists and financial writers never seem to ask that question.

Jim, if the strike tag doesn't work in the preview, does it work in the post?

Posted by: erp at January 6, 2006 6:29 PM

erp

No it will not post to the comment area at all. Only in the original post.

Posted by: h-man at January 6, 2006 8:08 PM

Of course, unlike the OPEC folks in the 1970s, one of the problems Chavez has if he decides to get into a snit and shut off the spigot is the Venenzuelan government's investment in both refining and distributuion facilities in the United States, through their purchase of Citgo several years ago. If Hugo cuts off the oil, he cuts off his own company's access, and the profits his government gets from that.

It doesn't mean he won't do it, but unlike his hero Fidel, who faced minimal financial losses from a clash with the evil capitalists to the north, Hugo will have to take a big hit in his own national pocketbook if he decides to use his oil as an economic weapon.

Posted by: John at January 6, 2006 10:16 PM

Chavez shuts down production, he is going to be killed. So, he won't do that.

Posted by: Bob at January 7, 2006 1:08 AM

Bob:

Yes, high oil prices hurt China much more than they hurt the U.S.:

China Rationing Gasoline And Diesel Fuel

Aug 09, 2005 China's most prosperous city of Guangzhou has begun rationing gasoline and diesel to cope with a fuel shortage. Guangzhou experienced a monthly shortfall of approximately 12,200 barrels per day of oil products, Xie Zhaowei, secretary of Guangzhou's Petroleum Industry Association, said. China National Petroleum officials said soaring oil prices and a refinery-imposed supply crunch led to a shortage in the consumer market. China's growing energy consumption is also a factor.

"Asia's largest oil refiner Sinopec relies on imports for much of its crude for refining, so the surging crude prices on the world market have greatly hurt the oil giant's refining business, when the central government still controls the price of domestic refined oil to stabilize the market," a CNPC official was quoted by the China Daily.

Robert Duquette:

Outside the US, more than 50% of oil is consumed for stationary, non-transportation purposes such as electricity production, where it is relatively easy to substitute natural gas for oil.

Therefore, the higher the cost of oil, the lower the demand - with a few months' lag.

Posted by: Michael Herdegen at January 7, 2006 5:12 AM
« HARD-WON AND EASILY LOST | Main | DR SEUSS, YOU SILLY GOOSE... »