January 4, 2006
SMAUGGY WEATHER:
Don't Overestimate the Dragon's Power (Desmond Lachman, January 4, 2006, Australian Financial Review )
Among the more enduring features of the global economic landscape over the past 15 years has been America's remarkable productivity performance. While Japan has been mired in its post-bubble deflation and an inflexible Europe has virtually stagnated, US economic growth has consistently outstripped that of its major industrialized competitors. And, despite all the ballyhoo about increased global competition and underlying US economic imbalances, the US productivity miracle shows little sign of abating.The most recent Federal Reserve estimates suggest that the US productivity machine is humming and that US economic potential growth is likely to be about 3 per cent for the foreseeable future. This would be not only a triumph for free-market economics but would place the US economy in a class of its own among the world's more mature economies.
Yet a dangerous myth is stalking international financial capitals. It is the idea that China has finally awoken and that the 21st century is going to belong to Asia.
This myth overlooks China's fundamental political weaknesses. It also turns a blind eye to China's economic clay feet and its many economic vulnerabilities. As such, it unnecessarily stokes American fears about the rising Chinese dragon and runs the danger of spawning protectionist pressures, which could undermine the global trading system. [...]
While there are many and very real short-term risks to the Chinese economic miracle, the more fundamental reason why the US need not fear a long-run economic challenge from China lies in the disparate productivity performance between the two economies. China's recent rapid growth has not been the product of technological innovation or productivity increases of the sort that is now taken for granted in the US. Rather, it has been the product of investing an inordinate proportion of its income and of bringing part of its rural labor surplus into the market economy.
China won't officially have jumped the shark until Michael Crichton writes a hysterical thriller about it or a Democrat runs for president saying we need to adopt their system. Posted by Orrin Judd at January 4, 2006 3:11 PM
Had Bill Clinton been eligible for a 3rd term, he no doubt would have advocated for the Chinese model.
Posted by: jim hamlen at January 4, 2006 4:36 PMThe Chicom model doesn't have health care, what would Evita do?
Posted by: Sandy P at January 4, 2006 5:08 PMChina won't officially have jumped the shark until . . . a Democrat runs for president saying we need to adopt their system.
Let's see . . . abortion, state-directed industrial policy, suppression of religion . . . I think they're there already.
Posted by: Mike Morley at January 4, 2006 7:15 PMSMAUGGY WEATHER
How do you come up with this stuff?
Posted by: Matt Murphy at January 4, 2006 7:59 PMHow can I forgive you for reminding me of Rising Sun? Bleaaaaggggghhhhh!
Although Chrichton does seem a bit saner these days...
Posted by: Kirk Parker at January 4, 2006 9:56 PMIndia, not China.
Posted by: Bemac at January 4, 2006 10:38 PMI don't worry too much about India, either. While they're doing well now, I think it's more likely than not that the citizenry, flush with cash from the boom, will revert to socialism and protectionism, thereby destroying their economy. Argentina was once a serious competitor until Peronism dropped them back to third world status.
Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at January 5, 2006 12:49 PM