January 6, 2006

LEAVE IT TO THE CANADIANS TO ELECT A TV STAR DOG:

Harper can learn from Diefenbaker campaign (ALLAN LEVINE, Jan. 3, 2006, Toronto Star)

Across the country, voters had had enough. The Liberals had displayed an unacceptable arrogance — and for far too long. They had rammed through a controversial bill to build a pipeline; shown wanton disregard for taxpayers' money; and introduced a less than satisfactory budget. Their leader looked old and tired.

Worst of all, they maintained, despite all evidence to the contrary, that they knew what was best for Canadians.

When Prime Minister Louis St. Laurent called an election in the spring of 1957, the Liberals had been in power since William Lyon Mackenzie King had defeated R.B. Bennett's Conservatives in 1935. They believed that they were the "natural governing party" and entitled to rule for as long as they deemed fit.

Sound familiar? [...]

As prominent Ottawa journalist Blair Fraser wrote a few months before the vote, "Political historians may well conclude that the Liberals fell, not because of any one policy, and certainly not a pipeline policy of which the average voter knew little and cared less, but because they failed to observe the proper limits of power."

As for Diefenbaker, he was a charismatic force on the campaign trail.

Whereas, St. Laurent appeared weary and was portrayed as "yesterday's man," Diefenbaker, although he was 62 years old (St. Laurent was 75), seemed fresh and honest.

He railed against the Liberal "dictatorship" and the party's "mockery" of Parliament during the pipeline debate. More important, he had a vision about a "new national policy" and "one unhyphenated Canada" that would restore the country's sagging spirit.


Dump Harper and nominate Constable Benton Fraser.

Posted by Orrin Judd at January 6, 2006 5:03 PM
Comments

Well, this is Canada's main liberal paper. According to my taxi driver (an immigrant) this evening, the streets will explode in joy if the Conservatives win. There are rumblings of big things, but two weeks is a lifetime in a Canadian election. Lots of time left for some candidate to come out against education for women.

Posted by: Peter B at January 6, 2006 5:52 PM

what's the going rate for a cananadian MP these days, about $50 ?

that was a pretty classy display at the recent junior hockey tournament, says a lot about the scale of canadian ambitions.

Posted by: toe at January 6, 2006 6:09 PM

toe:

I'm glad you noticed it and I wish more Americans did. What goes around comes around.

Posted by: Peter B at January 6, 2006 6:55 PM

Are you ready to rum-bbbbbbbbbblllllllllllllleeeeeeeeeeeee?!

Posted by: Jayson at January 6, 2006 8:50 PM

Diefenbaker was a deaf wolf, although I think he could read lips.

Posted by: Bob Hawkins at January 6, 2006 9:13 PM

Yawn.

Posted by: Bob at January 7, 2006 12:56 AM

Yawn? For Canada to even start having second thoughts about its role as junior partner in an alliance with France is good news. Too bad the Canadian Stupid Party will find some new and novel way to throw this opportunity away. (At least it appears that no matter what, the NDP is going to collateral damage as the semi-intellegent in the Ontario Left realize this isn't an election to waste a vote on principled losers, but one to keep out the Greater Evil at all costs.)

Posted by: Raoul Ortega at January 7, 2006 1:32 AM

What do you mean by the Greater Evil? Alberta?

Posted by: Flip at January 7, 2006 11:16 AM

For NDP Leftists, which Evil would you prefer running the country, the corrupt and empty but well-meaning Liberals or the Crypto Fascist Racist Xtian-controlled Conservatives?

Posted by: Raoul Ortega at January 7, 2006 12:57 PM

Yes, yawn.

Cute little election the toy country is having.

Posted by: Bob at January 7, 2006 8:13 PM
« ELEVEN MLLION YEARS WITHOUT A SPECIATION TO SHOW FOR IT: | Main | MOST PEOPLE WOULD TURN YOU AWAY, I DON'T LISTEN TO A WORD THEY SAY*: »