January 13, 2006
HOW ABOUT ANOTHER CONFERENCE...ANYBODY UP FOR A CONFERENCE?
Iran threatens to end all cooperation with IAEA (Associated press, January 13th, 2006)
Iran threatened on Friday to block inspections of its nuclear sites if the U.N. Security Council confronts it over its nuclear activities.Germany, Britain and France said Thursday that nuclear talks with Tehran had reached a dead end after more than two years of acrimonious negotiations and the issue should be referred to the Security Council.
However, the Europeans held back from calling on the 15-nation council to impose sanctions and said they remained open to more talks.
France said Friday that it favors a step-by-step approach with Iran over its nuclear program and that any sanctions request at this stage would be premature.
“We, like our partners, like the British and the Germans, consider that this co-request for sanctions is premature for the moment,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Jean-Baptiste Mattei said.[...]
British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said he had “strong suspicion” that Iran wanted to build a nuclear bomb but stressed that there was no categorical evidence to prove that.[...]
He added that while Iran could face Security Council sanctions for resuming its nuclear activities, military action is not being considered.
“This can only be resolved by peaceful means. Nobody is talking about invading Iran or taking military action,” he said.
Is it any wonder so many of the world’s tyrants conclude the West is simply too enervated and frightened to confront them?
"This can only be resolved by peaceful means. Nobody is talking about invading Iran or taking military action,
Really Mr. Straw? Give you a hint since Whitehall may have missed it: IAF.
Posted by: Luciferous at January 13, 2006 2:58 PMHmm...does any of this sound familiar?
Posted by: sharon at January 13, 2006 3:05 PMThere should definitely be a conference. Many conferences. One at every Iranian nuclear location, with every member of the 82nd Airborne invited.
Posted by: b at January 13, 2006 3:12 PMIt appears that this is the time for the West to begin its official hand wringing over Iran.
Posted by: John J. Coupal at January 13, 2006 3:12 PMThe President and the govt should now be judged accordingly to how swiftly the military is prepared to deal with Iran. It is easier to say it than actually be the case, but we do not have infinite time.
I suspect more than airstrikes are needed, but total occupation of the country is not. The objective is to secure the nuclear sites well enough to confirm absolutely that bomb materials are destroyed and that the infrastructure for manufacture is dismantled.
Obstensibly, it need not be a complete regime change and a negotiated peace/surrender is feasible as long as our non-negotiable demands for the destruction of the weapons program are achieved. The clerics might be willing to make a deal if all that is lost is the program and Ahmadinejad.
Posted by: Chris Durnell at January 13, 2006 3:21 PMThis is what came to my mind:
Hans Brix: "Or else we will be very,
very angry with you."
"And we will write you a *letter,
telling you how angry we are.
Kim Jong Il: "Okay, I'll show you, Hans.
"You ready?
"Stand a rittle to your reft...."
