December 22, 2005

TOO BAD THERE ARE SO FEW MODERATE LIBERALS:

Europe: A History (Norman Davies)

Conservatism began to crystallize as a coherent ideology in conjunction with liberal trends. It was not opposed to democracy or to change as such, and should not be confused with simple reactionary
positions. What it did was to insist that all change should be channelled and managed in such a way that the organic growth of established institutions of state and society--monarchy, Church, the social hierarchy, property, and the family--should not be threatened. [...] Like the liberals, the conservatives valued the individual, opposed the omnipotent state, and looked for a reduction of central executive powers. Through this, they often turned out to be the most effective of would-be reformers, toning down proposals coming from more radical points on the spectrum, and acting as the go-between with the ruling court. The ultimate distinction between liberal conservatives and moderate liberals was a fine one. In many democracies, the large area of agreement between them came to define the "middle ground" of political life.

Posted by Orrin Judd at December 22, 2005 5:26 PM
Comments

Do you believe that liberal democracy was at its best in Europe in 19th c. Britain?

Posted by: Grog at December 23, 2005 2:38 AM

One way to tell whether someone is a moderate (as opposed to a radical) liberal is to note whether they are able to make an analysis as subtle and discerning as this one rather than condemn their political opponents wholesale. Well done.

Posted by: Matt Murphy at December 23, 2005 5:37 AM

Grog:

Yes, Britain from the 17th to the later 19th century was liberal democracy's high point in Europe.

Posted by: oj at December 23, 2005 8:39 AM
« FINALLY, SOME STAGE MANAGEMENT: | Main | THE DEFEATED IN DECLINE: »